PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEAL vs. UNHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEAL vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEAL achieves a -15.57% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 15.08% return.


HEAL

1D
-1.16%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
-15.57%
6M
-20.78%
1Y
-22.08%
3Y*
-10.46%
5Y*
-14.71%
10Y*

UNHW

1D
0.06%
1M
2.06%
YTD
15.08%
6M
11.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEAL vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HEAL
Global X HealthTech ETF
-15.57%-6.16%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
15.08%-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between HEAL and UNHW is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.29

HEAL vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEAL
UNHW

Healthcare

96.0%
33.4%

Technology

3.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

HEAL
96.0%
UNHW
33.4%

Technology

HEAL
3.2%
UNHW

-

Basic Materials

HEAL

-

UNHW

-

Communication Services

HEAL

-

UNHW

-

Consumer Cyclical

HEAL

-

UNHW

-

Consumer Defensive

HEAL

-

UNHW

-

Energy

HEAL

-

UNHW

-

Financial Services

HEAL

-

UNHW

-

Industrials

HEAL

-

UNHW

-

Real Estate

HEAL

-

UNHW

-

Utilities

HEAL

-

UNHW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEAL vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEAL
HEAL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HEAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEAL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HEAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEAL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

UNHW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEAL vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEALUNHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

HEAL vs. UNHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEALUNHWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

0.50

-0.90

Drawdowns

HEAL vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEAL drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than UNHW's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL and UNHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEALUNHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.76%

-32.28%

-33.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.55%

-7.06%

-56.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.02%

-12.48%

-30.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.13%

Volatility

HEAL vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEALUNHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.89%

49.81%

-27.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.37%

49.81%

-23.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.18%

49.81%

-23.63%

HEAL vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEAL vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison

HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than UNHW's 17.33% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HEAL
Global X HealthTech ETF
0.39%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%
UNHW
Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
17.33%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEAL and UNHW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HEAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HEAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 17.33%, compared with 0.39% for HEAL.

HEAL is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HEAL and 0.99% for UNHW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEAL and UNHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer