HEAL vs. TRUH
HEAL (Global X HealthTech ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. HEAL is passively managed, while TRUH is actively managed. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HEAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
HEAL vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HEAL
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 1Y
- -10.31%
- 3Y*
- -6.93%
- 5Y*
- -12.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.16%
TRUH
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $260.96K | $227.88K | $213.27K | |
| $24.34K | $32.62K | $24.57K |
HEAL vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | 15.83% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 10.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEAL and TRUH is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEAL vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
HEAL
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HEAL vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEAL | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEAL vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEAL drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEAL | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -4.51% | -61.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.07% | -2.99% | -56.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -1.66% | -41.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.90% | — | — |
Volatility
HEAL vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEAL | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 17.52% | +5.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.67% | 17.52% | +9.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 17.52% | +8.75% |
HEAL vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEAL vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than TRUH's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEAL and TRUH have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HEAL.
TRUH has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.26% for HEAL.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HEAL and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for HEAL and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer