HEAL vs. SIL
HEAL (Global X HealthTech ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEAL is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Global X HealthTech Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HEAL returned -12.95%/yr vs 13.97%/yr for SIL. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HEAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.
Performance
HEAL vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEAL achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's -9.13% return.
HEAL
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 1Y
- -10.31%
- 3Y*
- -6.93%
- 5Y*
- -12.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.16%
SIL
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- 6M
- -18.67%
- YTD
- -9.13%
- 1Y
- 61.23%
- 3Y*
- 44.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.97%
- 10Y*
- 5.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $260.96K | $227.88K | $213.27K | |
| $64.85M | $66.09M | $119.11M |
HEAL vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | -5.19% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 16.89% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -9.13% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | -5.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEAL and SIL is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.32 |
HEAL vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEAL
SIL
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
HEAL
SIL
-
Technology
HEAL
SIL
-
Basic Materials
HEAL
-
SIL
Communication Services
HEAL
-
SIL
-
Consumer Cyclical
HEAL
-
SIL
-
Consumer Defensive
HEAL
-
SIL
Energy
HEAL
-
SIL
-
Financial Services
HEAL
-
SIL
-
Industrials
HEAL
-
SIL
-
Real Estate
HEAL
-
SIL
-
Utilities
HEAL
-
SIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEAL vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
HEAL
SIL
HEAL vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEAL | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.21 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 1.56 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | 3.26 | -3.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEAL vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEAL drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEAL | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -82.99% | +17.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -39.41% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.56% | -39.41% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.14% | -47.91% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.07% | -35.70% | -23.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -51.26% | +7.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.90% | 18.82% | -1.92% |
Volatility
HEAL vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) is 6.91%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that HEAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEAL | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 12.95% | -6.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 41.10% | -23.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 53.55% | -30.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.67% | 40.15% | -13.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 39.82% | -13.55% |
HEAL vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEAL vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than SIL's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.34% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEAL and SIL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIL has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to HEAL (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEAL dropped -65.76% vs SIL's -82.99%.
On 5-year performance, SIL leads with 13.97% vs -12.95% for HEAL. On fees, HEAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HEAL has been the lower-risk option at 6.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIL has performed better with a 13.97% return vs -12.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HEAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.
SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.26% for HEAL.
HEAL is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SIL is Silver. HEAL tracks Global X HealthTech Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HEAL and 0.65% for SIL.
SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEAL and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer