HDUS vs. ROSC
HDUS (Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF) and ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Hartford Disciplined US Equity Index, while ROSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HDUS returned 21.13%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for ROSC. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ROSC.
Performance
HDUS vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDUS achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly lower than ROSC's 11.71% return.
HDUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROSC
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 30.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
HDUS vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDUS Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF | 10.84% | 17.17% | 23.57% | 21.17% | -2.14% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 11.71% | 10.18% | 7.28% | 18.88% | -3.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDUS and ROSC is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between HDUS and ROSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
HDUS vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDUS
ROSC
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
HDUS
ROSC
Financial Services
HDUS
ROSC
Communication Services
HDUS
ROSC
Consumer Cyclical
HDUS
ROSC
Industrials
HDUS
ROSC
Healthcare
HDUS
ROSC
Consumer Defensive
HDUS
ROSC
Real Estate
HDUS
ROSC
Energy
HDUS
ROSC
Utilities
HDUS
ROSC
Basic Materials
HDUS
ROSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDUS vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank
HDUS
ROSC
HDUS vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF (HDUS) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDUS | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.35 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 3.95 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.05 | 12.81 | +4.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDUS | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 1.97 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.42 | 0.46 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
HDUS vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDUS drawdown since its inception was -17.94%, smaller than the maximum ROSC drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDUS and ROSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDUS | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.94% | -43.13% | +25.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.48% | -7.75% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.94% | -23.74% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -1.76% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -7.21% | +5.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 2.39% | -0.83% |
Volatility
HDUS vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF (HDUS) is 2.48%, while Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that HDUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDUS | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 3.54% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 10.30% | -2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.96% | 15.56% | -4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 19.32% | -5.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 20.28% | -6.13% |
HDUS vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDUS vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison
HDUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than ROSC's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDUS Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF | 1.32% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.36% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.87% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDUS and ROSC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROSC has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to HDUS (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDUS dropped -17.94% vs ROSC's -43.13%.
On 3-year performance, HDUS leads with 21.13% vs 15.86% for ROSC. On fees, HDUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, HDUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HDUS has performed better with a 21.13% return vs 15.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.
ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.32% for HDUS.
HDUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ROSC is Small Cap Blend Equities. HDUS tracks Hartford Disciplined US Equity Index, while ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HDUS and 0.34% for ROSC.
HDUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDUS and ROSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer