PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDUS vs. HFSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDUS vs. HFSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF (HDUS) and Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDUS achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly higher than HFSI's 1.38% return.


HDUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.44%
YTD
10.84%
6M
10.51%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
21.13%
5Y*
10Y*

HFSI

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.87%
YTD
1.38%
6M
1.51%
1Y
8.47%
3Y*
8.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDUS vs. HFSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HDUS
Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF
10.84%17.17%23.57%21.17%-2.14%
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
1.38%9.56%7.91%9.91%2.23%

Correlation

The correlation between HDUS and HFSI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2022

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDUS vs. HFSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDUS
HDUS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
HDUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HDUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

HFSI
HFSI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDUS vs. HFSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF (HDUS) and Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDUSHFSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

2.78

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.05

11.13

+5.92

HDUS vs. HFSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the HFSI Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDUS and HFSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDUSHFSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.37

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.42

0.55

+0.87

Drawdowns

HDUS vs. HFSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDUS drawdown since its inception was -17.94%, smaller than the maximum HFSI drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDUS and HFSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDUSHFSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.94%

-19.34%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.48%

-3.06%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.94%

-5.11%

-12.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.20%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-5.72%

+3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

0.76%

+0.80%

Volatility

HDUS vs. HFSI - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF (HDUS) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) at 1.13%. This indicates that HDUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDUSHFSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

1.13%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

2.52%

+5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

3.58%

+7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

4.97%

+9.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.15%

4.97%

+9.18%

HDUS vs. HFSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HFSI's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDUS vs. HFSI - Dividend Comparison

HDUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than HFSI's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HDUS
Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF
1.32%1.45%1.58%1.36%0.33%0.00%
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
5.54%5.67%6.51%5.77%4.87%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDUS and HFSI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDUS has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to HFSI (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDUS dropped -17.94% vs HFSI's -19.34%.

On 3-year performance, HDUS leads with 21.13% vs 8.37% for HFSI. On fees, HDUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, HFSI has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HDUS has performed better with a 21.13% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HFSI.

HFSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 1.32% for HDUS.

HDUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HFSI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HDUS and 0.49% for HFSI.

HDUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDUS and HFSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer