HDUS vs. COMT
HDUS (Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Hartford Disciplined US Equity Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. HDUS is passively managed, while COMT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HDUS returned 21.13%/yr vs 16.86%/yr for COMT. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
HDUS vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDUS achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.
HDUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
HDUS vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDUS Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF | 10.84% | 17.17% | 23.57% | 21.17% | -2.14% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.67% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | -2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDUS and COMT is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2022 | 0.09 |
The correlation between HDUS and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDUS vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDUS
COMT
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
HDUS
COMT
-
Financial Services
HDUS
COMT
Communication Services
HDUS
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
HDUS
COMT
-
Industrials
HDUS
COMT
-
Healthcare
HDUS
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
HDUS
COMT
-
Real Estate
HDUS
COMT
-
Energy
HDUS
COMT
-
Utilities
HDUS
COMT
-
Basic Materials
HDUS
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDUS vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
HDUS
COMT
HDUS vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF (HDUS) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDUS | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.40 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 5.95 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.05 | 14.11 | +2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDUS | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.24 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.42 | 0.20 | +1.22 |
Drawdowns
HDUS vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDUS drawdown since its inception was -17.94%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDUS and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDUS | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.94% | -51.89% | +33.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.48% | -8.02% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.94% | -13.31% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -4.82% | +3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -24.07% | +22.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 3.38% | -1.82% |
Volatility
HDUS vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF (HDUS) is 2.48%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that HDUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDUS | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 7.37% | -4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 18.80% | -10.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.96% | 21.29% | -10.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 21.06% | -6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 18.89% | -4.74% |
HDUS vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDUS vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
HDUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
HDUS Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF | 1.32% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.36% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDUS and COMT have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to HDUS (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDUS dropped -17.94% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 3-year performance, HDUS leads with 21.13% vs 16.86% for COMT. On fees, HDUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, HDUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HDUS has performed better with a 21.13% return vs 16.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 1.32% for HDUS.
HDUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HDUS and 0.48% for COMT.
HDUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDUS and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer