PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDPMX vs. FMCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDPMX vs. FMCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hodges Fund (HDPMX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDPMX achieves a 32.69% return, which is significantly higher than FMCSX's 20.06% return. Over the past 10 years, HDPMX has outperformed FMCSX with an annualized return of 15.66%, while FMCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.44% annualized return.


HDPMX

1D
-0.01%
1M
11.81%
YTD
32.69%
6M
30.26%
1Y
56.38%
3Y*
36.64%
5Y*
16.70%
10Y*
15.66%

FMCSX

1D
0.17%
1M
4.71%
YTD
20.06%
6M
17.75%
1Y
33.32%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDPMX vs. FMCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDPMX
Hodges Fund
32.69%24.06%29.32%29.81%-21.80%29.50%29.58%23.02%-34.39%13.87%
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
20.06%11.80%14.55%11.02%-6.40%28.64%11.43%25.39%-6.67%18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HDPMX and FMCSX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 1994

0.84

The correlation between HDPMX and FMCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDPMX vs. FMCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDPMX
HDPMX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HDPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HDPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FMCSX
FMCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FMCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDPMX vs. FMCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hodges Fund (HDPMX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDPMXFMCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.43

4.07

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.08

15.62

+1.46

HDPMX vs. FMCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDPMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the FMCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDPMX and FMCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDPMX vs. FMCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDPMX drawdown since its inception was -69.66%, which is greater than FMCSX's maximum drawdown of -62.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDPMX and FMCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDPMXFMCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.66%

-62.19%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-8.55%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.65%

-22.33%

-10.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.68%

-22.33%

-14.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.16%

-40.55%

-26.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.52%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.72%

-9.34%

-6.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

2.22%

+1.16%

Volatility

HDPMX vs. FMCSX - Volatility Comparison

Hodges Fund (HDPMX) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) at 5.53%. This indicates that HDPMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDPMXFMCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.50%

5.53%

+3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.18%

12.85%

+5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.75%

16.22%

+7.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.81%

17.77%

+12.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.48%

18.63%

+11.85%

HDPMX vs. FMCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDPMX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FMCSX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDPMX vs. FMCSX - Dividend Comparison

HDPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than FMCSX's 5.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
5.16%1.83%8.94%2.60%5.44%12.80%6.72%6.63%18.48%6.66%8.25%14.18%
HDPMX
Hodges Fund
7.16%9.50%15.93%0.72%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.67%7.26%0.00%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDPMX and FMCSX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDPMX has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to FMCSX (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDPMX dropped -69.66% vs FMCSX's -62.19%.

HDPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDPMX and FMCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer