PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDLV.L vs. XDWE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDLV.L vs. XDWE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HDLV.L is traded in USD, while XDWE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDWE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HDLV.L having a 12.36% return and XDWE.L slightly lower at 12.03%. Over the past 10 years, HDLV.L has underperformed XDWE.L with an annualized return of 6.66%, while XDWE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.


HDLV.L

1D
1.59%
1M
4.20%
6M
9.41%
YTD
12.36%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
12.35%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
6.66%

XDWE.L

1D
0.22%
1M
1.21%
6M
8.22%
YTD
12.03%
1Y
20.86%
3Y*
13.70%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
11.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDLV.L vs. XDWE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDLV.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist
12.36%3.58%16.39%1.20%0.44%24.81%-10.91%18.81%-7.12%11.37%
XDWE.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
12.03%11.79%12.16%13.47%-11.89%30.18%11.20%28.85%-9.06%18.09%

Correlation

The correlation between HDLV.L and XDWE.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2015

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between HDLV.L and XDWE.L has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HDLV.L vs. XDWE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDLV.L
XDWE.L

Real Estate

21.3%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

18.2%
6.4%

Financial Services

16.1%
13.9%

Utilities

13.9%
5.7%

Energy

11.9%
4.0%

Communication Services

8.6%
3.9%

Healthcare

5.1%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
10.0%

Technology

1.6%
20.9%

Industrials

0.0%
14.2%

Basic Materials

-

3.9%

Real Estate

HDLV.L
21.3%
XDWE.L
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

HDLV.L
18.2%
XDWE.L
6.4%

Financial Services

HDLV.L
16.1%
XDWE.L
13.9%

Utilities

HDLV.L
13.9%
XDWE.L
5.7%

Energy

HDLV.L
11.9%
XDWE.L
4.0%

Communication Services

HDLV.L
8.6%
XDWE.L
3.9%

Healthcare

HDLV.L
5.1%
XDWE.L
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HDLV.L
3.5%
XDWE.L
10.0%

Technology

HDLV.L
1.6%
XDWE.L
20.9%

Industrials

HDLV.L
0.0%
XDWE.L
14.2%

Basic Materials

HDLV.L

-

XDWE.L
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDLV.L vs. XDWE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDLV.L
HDLV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
HDLV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWE.L
XDWE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDLV.L vs. XDWE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDLV.LXDWE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.93

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.80

10.67

-5.87

HDLV.L vs. XDWE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDLV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDLV.L and XDWE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDLV.L vs. XDWE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDLV.L drawdown since its inception was -41.00%, smaller than the maximum XDWE.L drawdown of -98.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLV.L and XDWE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDLV.LXDWE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.00%

-98.45%

+57.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-7.08%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.56%

-19.08%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.04%

-21.62%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.00%

-38.50%

-2.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-4.99%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

1.95%

+1.22%

Volatility

HDLV.L vs. XDWE.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) at 2.26%. This indicates that HDLV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDLV.LXDWE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

2.26%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

7.16%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.07%

10.24%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.04%

20.58%

-6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

19.36%

-3.23%

HDLV.L vs. XDWE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDLV.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWE.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDLV.L vs. XDWE.L - Dividend Comparison

HDLV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, while XDWE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDLV.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist
3.44%3.91%3.54%4.04%3.56%3.37%4.35%3.69%3.79%3.07%3.07%1.89%
XDWE.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDLV.L and XDWE.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HDLV.L.

HDLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while XDWE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HDLV.L and 0.20% for XDWE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDLV.L and XDWE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer