HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L
HDLV.L (Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist) and LSPX.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) are both S&P 500 funds - HDLV.L tracks the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index while LSPX.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDLV.L returned 6.48%/yr vs 15.54%/yr for LSPX.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDLV.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for LSPX.L.
Performance
HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HDLV.L is traded in USD, while LSPX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LSPX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDLV.L achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than LSPX.L's 10.34% return. Over the past 10 years, HDLV.L has underperformed LSPX.L with an annualized return of 6.48%, while LSPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.
HDLV.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 8.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
LSPX.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 11.35%
- 1Y
- 28.11%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLV.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist | 4.40% | 3.58% | 16.39% | 1.20% | 0.46% | 24.79% | -10.93% | 18.82% | -7.10% | 11.38% |
LSPX.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 10.34% | 17.74% | 25.51% | 27.61% | -19.59% | 30.19% | 17.59% | 35.30% | -7.60% | 20.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDLV.L and LSPX.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2015 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HDLV.L and LSPX.L has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDLV.L
LSPX.L
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
HDLV.L
LSPX.L
Consumer Defensive
HDLV.L
LSPX.L
Financial Services
HDLV.L
LSPX.L
Energy
HDLV.L
LSPX.L
Utilities
HDLV.L
LSPX.L
Communication Services
HDLV.L
LSPX.L
Healthcare
HDLV.L
LSPX.L
Consumer Cyclical
HDLV.L
LSPX.L
Technology
HDLV.L
LSPX.L
Industrials
HDLV.L
LSPX.L
Basic Materials
HDLV.L
-
LSPX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
HDLV.L
LSPX.L
HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDLV.L | LSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.46 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 3.17 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 13.79 | -10.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDLV.L | LSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 2.54 | -1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.92 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 1.06 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.19 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDLV.L drawdown since its inception was -41.02%, which is greater than LSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLV.L and LSPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDLV.L | LSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.02% | -33.48% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.16% | -8.86% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.59% | -19.20% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.04% | -24.09% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.02% | -33.48% | -7.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -0.55% | -4.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -4.07% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.04% | +1.06% |
Volatility
HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) at 2.51%. This indicates that HDLV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDLV.L | LSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 2.51% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 7.96% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 11.07% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 15.89% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 17.24% | -1.08% |
HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDLV.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LSPX.L's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
HDLV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than LSPX.L's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLV.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist | 3.74% | 3.91% | 3.54% | 4.04% | 3.56% | 3.37% | 4.35% | 3.69% | 3.79% | 3.07% | 3.07% | 1.89% |
LSPX.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 0.91% | 1.00% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 2.06% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 1.70% | 1.97% | 1.72% | 1.87% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDLV.L and LSPX.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HDLV.L.
HDLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while LSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HDLV.L and 0.09% for LSPX.L.
Find the right allocation for HDLV.L and LSPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer