PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HDLV.L is traded in USD, while LSPX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LSPX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDLV.L achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than LSPX.L's 10.34% return. Over the past 10 years, HDLV.L has underperformed LSPX.L with an annualized return of 6.48%, while LSPX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


HDLV.L

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
4.40%
6M
5.51%
1Y
8.68%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
6.48%

LSPX.L

1D
0.02%
1M
4.63%
YTD
10.34%
6M
11.35%
1Y
28.11%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDLV.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist
4.40%3.58%16.39%1.20%0.46%24.79%-10.93%18.82%-7.10%11.38%
LSPX.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD
10.34%17.74%25.51%27.61%-19.59%30.19%17.59%35.30%-7.60%20.88%

Correlation

The correlation between HDLV.L and LSPX.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2015

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between HDLV.L and LSPX.L has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDLV.L
LSPX.L

Real Estate

20.1%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

17.8%
4.9%

Financial Services

15.6%
11.8%

Energy

14.1%
3.5%

Utilities

13.7%
2.4%

Communication Services

8.6%
11.2%

Healthcare

5.1%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
10.1%

Technology

1.4%
35.6%

Industrials

0.0%
8.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Real Estate

HDLV.L
20.1%
LSPX.L
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

HDLV.L
17.8%
LSPX.L
4.9%

Financial Services

HDLV.L
15.6%
LSPX.L
11.8%

Energy

HDLV.L
14.1%
LSPX.L
3.5%

Utilities

HDLV.L
13.7%
LSPX.L
2.4%

Communication Services

HDLV.L
8.6%
LSPX.L
11.2%

Healthcare

HDLV.L
5.1%
LSPX.L
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HDLV.L
3.4%
LSPX.L
10.1%

Technology

HDLV.L
1.4%
LSPX.L
35.6%

Industrials

HDLV.L
0.0%
LSPX.L
8.3%

Basic Materials

HDLV.L

-

LSPX.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDLV.L
HDLV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
HDLV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

LSPX.L
LSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDLV.LLSPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.46

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

3.17

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.80

13.79

-10.99

HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDLV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the LSPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDLV.L and LSPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDLV.LLSPX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

2.54

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.92

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

1.06

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.19

-0.72

Drawdowns

HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDLV.L drawdown since its inception was -41.02%, which is greater than LSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLV.L and LSPX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDLV.LLSPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.02%

-33.48%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-8.86%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.59%

-19.20%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.04%

-24.09%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.02%

-33.48%

-7.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.15%

-0.55%

-4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-4.07%

-1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.04%

+1.06%

Volatility

HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist (HDLV.L) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPX.L) at 2.51%. This indicates that HDLV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDLV.LLSPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

2.51%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

7.96%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

11.07%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.99%

15.89%

-1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

17.24%

-1.08%

HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDLV.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LSPX.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDLV.L vs. LSPX.L - Dividend Comparison

HDLV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than LSPX.L's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDLV.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF Dist
3.74%3.91%3.54%4.04%3.56%3.37%4.35%3.69%3.79%3.07%3.07%1.89%
LSPX.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD
0.91%1.00%1.27%1.02%2.06%1.10%1.53%1.70%1.97%1.72%1.87%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDLV.L and LSPX.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HDLV.L.

HDLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while LSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HDLV.L and 0.09% for LSPX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDLV.L and LSPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer