HDLB vs. PYPG
HDLB (ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B) and PYPG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. HDLB is passively managed, while PYPG is actively managed. Over the past year, HDLB returned 17.78% vs -73.73% for PYPG. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDLB charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PYPG.
Performance
HDLB vs. PYPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDLB achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than PYPG's -54.66% return.
HDLB
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- —
PYPG
- 1D
- -8.80%
- 1M
- -29.99%
- YTD
- -54.66%
- 6M
- -59.27%
- 1Y
- -73.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDLB vs. PYPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 9.69% | 19.14% |
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF | -54.66% | -16.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDLB and PYPG is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDLB vs. PYPG — Risk / Return Rank
HDLB
PYPG
HDLB vs. PYPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDLB | PYPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.78 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | -0.93 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | -1.47 | +4.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDLB | PYPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | -0.95 | +1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | -0.73 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
HDLB vs. PYPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDLB drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, roughly equal to the maximum PYPG drawdown of -79.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLB and PYPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDLB | PYPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.70% | -79.52% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.50% | -79.52% | +65.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.15% | -77.34% | +63.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.47% | -37.99% | +10.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 50.16% | -43.54% |
Volatility
HDLB vs. PYPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) is 6.21%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG) has a volatility of 19.74%. This indicates that HDLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDLB | PYPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 19.74% | -13.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.14% | 68.28% | -50.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.46% | 77.89% | -51.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.55% | 78.51% | -47.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.58% | 78.51% | -34.93% |
HDLB vs. PYPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDLB has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PYPG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDLB vs. PYPG - Dividend Comparison
HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.13%, while PYPG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 12.13% | 12.20% | 10.09% | 12.36% | 10.86% | 8.07% | 16.23% | 0.97% |
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDLB and PYPG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPG has higher volatility (19.74%) compared to HDLB (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDLB dropped -78.70% vs PYPG's -79.52%.
On 1-year performance, HDLB leads with 17.78% vs -73.73% for PYPG. On fees, PYPG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HDLB has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HDLB has performed better with a 17.78% return vs -73.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PYPG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for HDLB.
HDLB has the higher dividend yield at 12.13%, compared with 0.00% for PYPG.
They also come from different issuers: UBS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.65% for HDLB and 0.75% for PYPG.
HDLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDLB and PYPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer