PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDLB vs. PDC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDLB vs. PDC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HDLB is traded in USD, while PDC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the PDC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDLB achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than PDC.TO's 17.55% return.


HDLB

1D
-1.72%
1M
-4.18%
YTD
9.69%
6M
8.78%
1Y
17.78%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*

PDC.TO

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.59%
YTD
17.55%
6M
17.76%
1Y
33.65%
3Y*
18.79%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDLB vs. PDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HDLB
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B
9.69%27.26%28.21%-4.12%-11.46%62.67%-50.94%7.93%
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
17.55%27.45%6.97%9.17%-10.74%30.87%-3.81%4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between HDLB and PDC.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2019

0.61

The correlation between HDLB and PDC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDLB vs. PDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDLB
HDLB Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
HDLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

PDC.TO
PDC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDLB vs. PDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDLBPDC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.65

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

6.75

-5.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.69

23.12

-20.43

HDLB vs. PDC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDLB and PDC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDLBPDC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

3.44

-2.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.68

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.45

-0.36

Drawdowns

HDLB vs. PDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDLB drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, which is greater than PDC.TO's maximum drawdown of -47.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLB and PDC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDLBPDC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.70%

-47.11%

-31.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

-5.00%

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

-15.42%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.81%

-26.36%

-17.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.15%

-0.85%

-13.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.47%

-8.53%

-18.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.62%

1.46%

+5.16%

Volatility

HDLB vs. PDC.TO - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) at 3.01%. This indicates that HDLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDLBPDC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

3.01%

+3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.14%

8.19%

+9.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.46%

9.83%

+16.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.55%

14.77%

+15.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.58%

18.74%

+24.84%

HDLB vs. PDC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDLB has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PDC.TO's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDLB vs. PDC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.13%, more than PDC.TO's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDLB
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B
12.13%12.20%10.09%12.36%10.86%8.07%16.23%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
3.26%3.84%4.29%4.56%4.05%3.49%4.85%4.14%4.90%4.05%3.61%4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDLB and PDC.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PDC.TO is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PDC.TO is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for HDLB.

HDLB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PDC.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.65% for HDLB and 0.58% for PDC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDLB and PDC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer