HDLB vs. MULL
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL).
HDLB and MULL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HDLB is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%). It was launched on Oct 24, 2019. MULL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Nov 11, 2024.
Performance
HDLB vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HDLB vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 17.61% | 27.26% | -6.74% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 18.59% | 558.51% | -40.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDLB achieves a 17.61% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 18.59% return.
HDLB
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -7.39%
- YTD
- 17.61%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 20.54%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 15.09%
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- 9.98%
- 1M
- -37.16%
- YTD
- 18.59%
- 6M
- 194.62%
- 1Y
- 734.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HDLB vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDLB has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HDLB vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
HDLB
MULL
HDLB vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDLB | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 5.72 | -5.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 3.60 | -2.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.48 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 13.35 | -12.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 37.78 | -33.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDLB | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 5.72 | -5.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 1.62 | -1.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between HDLB and MULL is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
HDLB vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%, more than MULL's 0.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 10.80% | 12.20% | 10.09% | 12.36% | 10.86% | 8.07% | 16.23% | 0.97% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.33% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HDLB vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDLB drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLB and MULL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDLB | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.70% | -72.29% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.94% | -53.09% | +32.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.94% | -48.41% | +40.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.93% | -21.94% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.23% | 18.76% | -12.53% |
Volatility
HDLB vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) is 8.24%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 47.04%. This indicates that HDLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HDLB | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 47.04% | -38.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.54% | 98.50% | -77.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.79% | 129.87% | -97.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.42% | 129.40% | -98.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.95% | 129.40% | -85.45% |