PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDLB vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HDLB vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HDLB vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDLB achieves a 17.61% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 18.59% return.


HDLB

1D
0.27%
1M
-7.39%
YTD
17.61%
6M
9.68%
1Y
20.54%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
15.09%
10Y*

MULL

1D
9.98%
1M
-37.16%
YTD
18.59%
6M
194.62%
1Y
734.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HDLB vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDLB has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HDLB vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDLB
HDLB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HDLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDLB vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDLBMULLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

5.72

-5.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

3.60

-2.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.48

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

13.35

-12.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.80

37.78

-33.98

HDLB vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 5.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDLB and MULL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDLBMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

5.72

-5.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

1.62

-1.50

Correlation

The correlation between HDLB and MULL is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

HDLB vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%, more than MULL's 0.33% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
HDLB
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B
10.80%12.20%10.09%12.36%10.86%8.07%16.23%0.97%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
0.33%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HDLB vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDLB drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLB and MULL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HDLBMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.70%

-72.29%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.94%

-53.09%

+32.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.94%

-48.41%

+40.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.93%

-21.94%

-5.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.23%

18.76%

-12.53%

Volatility

HDLB vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) is 8.24%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 47.04%. This indicates that HDLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HDLBMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.24%

47.04%

-38.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.54%

98.50%

-77.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.79%

129.87%

-97.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.42%

129.40%

-98.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.95%

129.40%

-85.45%