HDLB vs. FDIV
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV).
HDLB and FDIV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HDLB is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%). It was launched on Oct 24, 2019. FDIV is an actively managed fund by MarketDesk. It was launched on Sep 19, 2023.
Performance
HDLB vs. FDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HDLB vs. FDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 17.61% | 27.26% | 28.21% | -4.12% | -11.46% | 62.67% | -50.94% | 7.93% |
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF | -0.78% | 2.95% | -37.35% | 6.78% | -9.97% | 10.20% | -2.84% | 1.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDLB achieves a 17.61% return, which is significantly higher than FDIV's -0.78% return.
HDLB
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -7.39%
- YTD
- 17.61%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 20.54%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 15.09%
- 10Y*
- —
FDIV
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -5.92%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 2.60%
- 3Y*
- -12.50%
- 5Y*
- -8.22%
- 10Y*
- -1.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HDLB vs. FDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDLB has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HDLB vs. FDIV — Risk / Return Rank
HDLB
FDIV
HDLB vs. FDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDLB | FDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 0.15 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 0.36 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.05 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 0.25 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 0.88 | +2.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDLB | FDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.15 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | -0.40 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | -0.09 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between HDLB and FDIV is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HDLB vs. FDIV - Dividend Comparison
HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%, more than FDIV's 2.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 10.80% | 12.20% | 10.09% | 12.36% | 10.86% | 8.07% | 16.23% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF | 2.93% | 2.95% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.81% | 3.79% | 4.17% | 3.93% | 5.13% | 3.81% | 3.84% | 4.13% |
Drawdowns
HDLB vs. FDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDLB drawdown since its inception was -78.70%, which is greater than FDIV's maximum drawdown of -47.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLB and FDIV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDLB | FDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.70% | -47.90% | -30.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.94% | -13.03% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.81% | -47.90% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.94% | -38.97% | +31.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.93% | -10.75% | -17.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.23% | 3.74% | +2.49% |
Volatility
HDLB vs. FDIV - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) at 3.73%. This indicates that HDLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HDLB | FDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 3.73% | +4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.54% | 8.31% | +12.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.79% | 17.42% | +15.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.42% | 20.69% | +9.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.95% | 17.58% | +26.37% |