HDLB vs. AMTR
HDLB (ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B) and AMTR (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - HDLB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%), while AMTR is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDLB charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMTR.
Performance
HDLB vs. AMTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HDLB
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- —
AMTR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDLB vs. AMTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 9.69% | 27.26% | 28.21% | -4.12% | -11.46% | 62.67% | 31.00% |
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 44.68% | 12.75% | 20.41% | 36.99% | 15.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDLB and AMTR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2020 | 0.48 |
The correlation between HDLB and AMTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDLB vs. AMTR — Risk / Return Rank
HDLB
AMTR
HDLB vs. AMTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDLB | AMTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDLB | AMTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | — | — |
Drawdowns
HDLB vs. AMTR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDLB | AMTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.15% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.47% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | — | — |
Volatility
HDLB vs. AMTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDLB | AMTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.46% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.55% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.58% | — | — |
HDLB vs. AMTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDLB has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AMTR's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDLB vs. AMTR - Dividend Comparison
HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.13%, while AMTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDLB ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B | 12.13% | 12.20% | 10.09% | 12.36% | 10.86% | 8.07% | 16.23% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDLB and AMTR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMTR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMTR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for HDLB.
HDLB has the higher dividend yield at 12.13%, compared with 0.00% for AMTR.
HDLB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMTR is MLPs. HDLB tracks Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%), while AMTR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 1.65% for HDLB and 0.75% for AMTR.
Find the right allocation for HDLB and AMTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer