PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDGB.L vs. AGED.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDGB.L vs. AGED.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HDGB.L) and iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGED.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HDGB.L is traded in GBP, while AGED.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AGED.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDGB.L achieves a 32.72% return, which is significantly higher than AGED.L's 11.13% return.


HDGB.L

1D
-1.51%
1M
-13.74%
6M
14.76%
YTD
32.72%
1Y
55.48%
3Y*
-8.38%
5Y*
-12.94%
10Y*

AGED.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
3.35%
6M
8.18%
YTD
11.13%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDGB.L vs. AGED.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HDGB.L
VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
32.72%10.07%-28.93%-27.71%-31.76%-20.01%
AGED.L
iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.13%17.72%9.74%3.58%-4.09%0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between HDGB.L and AGED.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2021

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between HDGB.L and AGED.L has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDGB.L vs. AGED.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDGB.L
HDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

AGED.L
AGED.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AGED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AGED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDGB.L vs. AGED.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HDGB.L) and iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGED.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDGB.LAGED.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.41

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.15

11.93

-7.78

HDGB.L vs. AGED.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the AGED.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDGB.L and AGED.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDGB.L vs. AGED.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDGB.L drawdown since its inception was -80.00%, which is greater than AGED.L's maximum drawdown of -31.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGB.L and AGED.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDGB.LAGED.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.00%

-31.59%

-48.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.53%

-7.13%

-23.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.35%

-17.70%

-45.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.00%

-19.39%

-60.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.70%

-1.92%

-57.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.61%

-4.91%

-46.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.34%

2.04%

+11.30%

Volatility

HDGB.L vs. AGED.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HDGB.L) has a higher volatility of 10.38% compared to iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AGED.L) at 3.84%. This indicates that HDGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGED.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDGB.LAGED.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.38%

3.84%

+6.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.41%

11.99%

+15.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.12%

15.13%

+23.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.53%

16.44%

+18.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.61%

16.96%

+17.65%

HDGB.L vs. AGED.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDGB.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AGED.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDGB.L vs. AGED.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HDGB.L nor AGED.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HDGB.L and AGED.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGED.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGED.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HDGB.L.

HDGB.L is categorized as Hydrogen Economy, while AGED.L is Global Equities. HDGB.L tracks MVIS Global Hydrogen Economy ESG Index, while AGED.L tracks Stoxx Global Ageing Population Net USD Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for HDGB.L and 0.40% for AGED.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDGB.L and AGED.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer