PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDG vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDG vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDG achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 61.91% return. Over the past 10 years, HDG has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 3.89%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 44.95% annualized return.


HDG

1D
0.21%
1M
1.08%
YTD
6.62%
6M
7.09%
1Y
13.32%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
3.06%
10Y*
3.89%

TQQQ

1D
-1.55%
1M
26.46%
YTD
61.91%
6M
54.01%
1Y
132.34%
3Y*
68.49%
5Y*
27.97%
10Y*
44.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDG vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDG
ProShares Hedge Replication
6.62%7.18%5.12%7.14%-8.48%2.97%7.45%9.58%-4.52%5.59%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
61.91%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between HDG and TQQQ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2011

0.64

The correlation between HDG and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDG vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDG
TQQQ

Industrials

17.7%
2.8%

Technology

17.0%
53.8%

Healthcare

16.5%
4.2%

Financial Services

15.8%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
12.3%

Real Estate

6.1%
0.1%

Energy

6.1%
0.6%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.1%

Utilities

2.9%
1.4%

Communication Services

2.4%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
7.7%

Industrials

HDG
17.7%
TQQQ
2.8%

Technology

HDG
17.0%
TQQQ
53.8%

Healthcare

HDG
16.5%
TQQQ
4.2%

Financial Services

HDG
15.8%
TQQQ
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HDG
8.4%
TQQQ
12.3%

Real Estate

HDG
6.1%
TQQQ
0.1%

Energy

HDG
6.1%
TQQQ
0.6%

Basic Materials

HDG
4.8%
TQQQ
1.1%

Utilities

HDG
2.9%
TQQQ
1.4%

Communication Services

HDG
2.4%
TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

HDG
2.4%
TQQQ
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDG vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDG
HDG Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDG vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDGTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.39

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

3.60

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

11.77

+2.14

HDG vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDG Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDG and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDGTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.80

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.42

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.68

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.74

-0.30

Drawdowns

HDG vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDG drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDG and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDGTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-81.66%

+66.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.97%

-36.97%

+33.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.20%

-58.04%

+50.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.31%

-81.66%

+66.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.31%

-81.66%

+66.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-2.29%

+2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-18.52%

+15.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

11.28%

-10.32%

Volatility

HDG vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) is 1.72%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.35%. This indicates that HDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDGTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

13.35%

-11.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.58%

36.04%

-31.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.63%

47.60%

-41.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.15%

66.50%

-59.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.11%

65.95%

-58.84%

HDG vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HDG and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

HDG vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

HDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than TQQQ's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDG
ProShares Hedge Replication
2.35%2.55%3.50%3.48%0.39%0.00%0.08%1.09%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.37%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDG and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.35%) compared to HDG (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDG dropped -15.31% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.95% vs 3.89% for HDG. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, HDG has been the lower-risk option at 1.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.95% return vs 3.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDG and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

HDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.37% for TQQQ.

HDG is categorized as Long-Short, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. HDG tracks Merrill Lynch Factor Model - Exchange Series, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDG and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer