HDG vs. SCHD
HDG (ProShares Hedge Replication) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDG is a Long-Short fund tracking the Merrill Lynch Factor Model - Exchange Series, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDG returned 3.89%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for SCHD. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
HDG vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDG achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, HDG has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 3.89%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.79% annualized return.
HDG
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 13.32%
- 3Y*
- 7.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.89%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 28.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
HDG vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDG ProShares Hedge Replication | 6.62% | 7.18% | 5.12% | 7.14% | -8.48% | 2.97% | 7.45% | 9.58% | -4.52% | 5.59% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.82% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDG and SCHD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HDG and SCHD has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HDG vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDG
SCHD
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
HDG
SCHD
Technology
HDG
SCHD
Healthcare
HDG
SCHD
Financial Services
HDG
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
HDG
SCHD
Real Estate
HDG
SCHD
-
Energy
HDG
SCHD
Basic Materials
HDG
SCHD
Utilities
HDG
SCHD
Communication Services
HDG
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
HDG
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDG vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
HDG
SCHD
HDG vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.47 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 6.26 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.91 | 15.38 | -1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.64 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.59 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.77 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.86 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
HDG vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDG drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDG and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -33.37% | +18.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.97% | -4.61% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.20% | -16.13% | +8.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.31% | -16.85% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -33.37% | +18.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.73% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -3.32% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 1.87% | -0.91% |
Volatility
HDG vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) is 1.72%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that HDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 2.69% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.58% | 7.65% | -3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.63% | 10.95% | -5.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 14.38% | -7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 16.71% | -9.60% |
HDG vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDG vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
HDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than SCHD's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDG ProShares Hedge Replication | 2.35% | 2.55% | 3.50% | 3.48% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.09% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDG and SCHD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to HDG (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDG dropped -15.31% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.79% vs 3.89% for HDG. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, HDG has been the lower-risk option at 1.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.79% return vs 3.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for HDG.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.35% for HDG.
HDG is categorized as Long-Short, while SCHD is Dividend. HDG tracks Merrill Lynch Factor Model - Exchange Series, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for HDG and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDG and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer