PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HDEM.L vs. SPXP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HDEM.L vs. SPXP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HDEM.L (Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDEM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDEM.L returned 8.19%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SPXP.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDEM.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.

Performance

HDEM.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDEM.L achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, HDEM.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 8.19%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.

HDEM.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
8.36%
6M
6.78%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
8.19%

SPXP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.53%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.49%
1Y
29.25%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
16.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDEM.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDEM.L
Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF		8.36%18.32%3.92%3.74%-6.39%15.10%-10.00%11.46%-1.01%16.23%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF		10.55%9.53%27.58%20.06%-8.79%31.26%13.90%26.76%0.26%10.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HDEM.L and SPXP.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2016

0.49

The correlation between HDEM.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (5 years) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDEM.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HDEM.L
SPXP.L

Financial Services

24.3%
11.8%

Energy

18.3%
3.5%

Industrials

10.6%
8.3%

Utilities

9.9%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
4.9%

Communication Services

6.0%
11.2%

Basic Materials

5.8%
1.8%

Real Estate

4.6%
1.9%

Technology

4.3%
35.6%

Healthcare

1.6%
8.5%

Financial Services

HDEM.L
24.3%
SPXP.L
11.8%

Energy

HDEM.L
18.3%
SPXP.L
3.5%

Industrials

HDEM.L
10.6%
SPXP.L
8.3%

Utilities

HDEM.L
9.9%
SPXP.L
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HDEM.L
7.6%
SPXP.L
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

HDEM.L
6.9%
SPXP.L
4.9%

Communication Services

HDEM.L
6.0%
SPXP.L
11.2%

Basic Materials

HDEM.L
5.8%
SPXP.L
1.8%

Real Estate

HDEM.L
4.6%
SPXP.L
1.9%

Technology

HDEM.L
4.3%
SPXP.L
35.6%

Healthcare

HDEM.L
1.6%
SPXP.L
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF

Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF

Often compared with HDEM.L:
HDEM.L vs. EUHD.LHDEM.L vs. WTEI.DEHDEM.L vs. EUNY.DEHDEM.L vs. JEPG.LHDEM.L vs. SCHDHDEM.L vs. JGPI.DEHDEM.L vs. JEPQ
Often compared with SPXP.L:
SPXP.L vs. VUAG.LSPXP.L vs. CSPX.LSPXP.L vs. SPXSSPXP.L vs. VOOSPXP.L vs. SPX5.LSPXP.L vs. SMT.LSPXP.L vs. SPXD.L

Return for Risk

HDEM.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HDEM.L
HDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDEM.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HDEM.LSPXP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.49
2.78

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.58
3.71

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.52

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.80

4.11

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.83

15.13

-1.29

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HDEM.L vs. SPXP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDEM.L and SPXP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HDEM.LSPXP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.78

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

1.06

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

1.10

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.15

-0.61

Drawdowns

HDEM.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDEM.L drawdown since its inception was -32.18%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDEM.L and SPXP.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HDEM.LSPXP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.18%

-25.46%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.28%

-7.09%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.22%

-20.77%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.05%

-20.77%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.18%

-25.46%

-6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-0.21%

-3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-3.50%

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.93%

-0.10%

Volatility

HDEM.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDEM.L) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that HDEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HDEM.LSPXP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

2.65%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.52%

7.24%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.18%

10.49%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.51%

14.23%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.82%

16.22%

-0.40%

HDEM.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDEM.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

HDEM.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison

HDEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, while SPXP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HDEM.L
Invesco FTSE EM High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF		4.86%5.17%5.62%6.08%8.93%5.96%4.31%5.23%5.37%6.81%2.78%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

HDEM.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HDEM.L.

HDEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. HDEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HDEM.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDEM.L and SPXP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer