PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCYAX vs. HCYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCYAX vs. HCYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hilton Tactical Income Fund (HCYAX) and Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class (HCYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCYAX achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than HCYIX's 3.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HCYAX having a 5.22% annualized return and HCYIX not far ahead at 5.46%.


HCYAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.38%
6M
1.85%
YTD
3.20%
1Y
8.11%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
5.22%
ALL TIME*
5.06%

HCYIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.38%
6M
2.01%
YTD
3.40%
1Y
8.40%
3Y*
8.71%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
5.46%
ALL TIME*
5.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HCYAX vs. HCYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCYAX
Hilton Tactical Income Fund
3.20%8.41%10.12%6.81%-10.88%15.51%-1.78%15.34%-2.96%8.06%
HCYIX
Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class
3.40%8.62%10.38%7.07%-10.69%15.81%-1.63%15.59%-2.78%8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between HCYAX and HCYIX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.99

The correlation between HCYAX and HCYIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCYAX vs. HCYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HCYAX
HCYAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HCYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HCYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

HCYIX
HCYIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HCYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HCYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HCYAX vs. HCYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Tactical Income Fund (HCYAX) and Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class (HCYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HCYAXHCYIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.60

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

6.46

-0.23

HCYAX vs. HCYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCYAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the HCYIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCYAX and HCYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HCYAX vs. HCYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCYAX drawdown since its inception was -25.70%, roughly equal to the maximum HCYIX drawdown of -25.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCYAX and HCYIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCYAXHCYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.70%

-25.70%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.14%

-5.12%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.73%

-7.73%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.90%

-13.75%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.70%

-25.70%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-3.12%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

1.26%

+0.01%

Volatility

HCYAX vs. HCYIX - Volatility Comparison

Hilton Tactical Income Fund (HCYAX) and Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class (HCYIX) have volatilities of 1.47% and 1.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCYAXHCYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

1.53%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.51%

4.56%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.62%

5.64%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

6.40%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.12%

8.12%

0.00%

HCYAX vs. HCYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCYAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than HCYIX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCYAX vs. HCYIX - Dividend Comparison

HCYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%, less than HCYIX's 6.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCYAX
Hilton Tactical Income Fund
6.05%6.26%3.22%2.81%2.77%2.40%3.26%2.64%3.98%2.54%3.63%4.28%
HCYIX
Hilton Tactical Income Fund Institutional Class
6.26%6.51%3.46%3.05%3.01%2.61%3.36%2.87%4.22%2.75%3.87%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, HCYAX and HCYIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HCYIX has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to HCYAX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCYAX dropped -25.70% vs HCYIX's -25.70%.

HCYIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCYAX and HCYIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer