PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCYAX vs. DXNLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCYAX vs. DXNLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hilton Tactical Income Fund (HCYAX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCYAX achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than DXNLX's 12.06% return.


HCYAX

1D
0.71%
1M
0.38%
6M
2.02%
YTD
3.20%
1Y
8.11%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
5.19%
ALL TIME*
5.06%

DXNLX

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.32%
6M
10.68%
YTD
12.06%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
23.67%
5Y*
13.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HCYAX vs. DXNLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCYAX
Hilton Tactical Income Fund
3.20%8.41%10.12%6.81%-10.88%15.51%-1.78%15.34%-2.96%8.06%
DXNLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund
12.06%22.13%28.56%66.63%-40.88%32.49%58.90%46.34%-3.37%37.37%

Correlation

The correlation between HCYAX and DXNLX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.72

The correlation between HCYAX and DXNLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCYAX vs. DXNLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HCYAX
HCYAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HCYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HCYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

DXNLX
DXNLX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DXNLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXNLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXNLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DXNLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXNLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HCYAX vs. DXNLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Tactical Income Fund (HCYAX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HCYAXDXNLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.17

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.41

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.18

4.48

+1.71

HCYAX vs. DXNLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCYAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the DXNLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCYAX and DXNLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HCYAX vs. DXNLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCYAX drawdown since its inception was -25.70%, smaller than the maximum DXNLX drawdown of -43.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCYAX and DXNLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCYAXDXNLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.70%

-43.77%

+18.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.14%

-15.91%

+10.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.73%

-28.35%

+20.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.90%

-43.77%

+29.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.69%

+10.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-8.65%

+5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

4.99%

-3.72%

Volatility

HCYAX vs. DXNLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hilton Tactical Income Fund (HCYAX) is 1.49%, while Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that HCYAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXNLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCYAXDXNLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

6.96%

-5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.52%

19.44%

-14.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.63%

23.72%

-18.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

28.79%

-22.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.12%

28.93%

-20.81%

HCYAX vs. DXNLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCYAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DXNLX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCYAX vs. DXNLX - Dividend Comparison

HCYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than DXNLX's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXNLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund
0.89%2.31%0.17%0.00%0.00%7.43%12.20%0.00%8.79%7.52%0.00%0.00%
HCYAX
Hilton Tactical Income Fund
6.05%6.26%3.22%2.81%2.77%2.40%3.26%2.64%3.98%2.54%3.63%4.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


HCYAX and DXNLX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXNLX has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to HCYAX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCYAX dropped -25.70% vs DXNLX's -43.77%.

HCYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCYAX and DXNLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer