HCRE.TO vs. ZGI.TO
HCRE.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF) and ZGI.TO (BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCRE.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index (Total Return), while ZGI.TO is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure North American Listed Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HCRE.TO returned 4.08%/yr vs 10.96%/yr for ZGI.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HCRE.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for ZGI.TO.
Performance
HCRE.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCRE.TO achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly lower than ZGI.TO's 13.70% return.
HCRE.TO
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 12.46%
- 1Y
- 13.75%
- 3Y*
- 9.01%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- —
ZGI.TO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 11.48%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
HCRE.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCRE.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF | 9.90% | 12.54% | 3.71% | 0.93% | -17.12% | 33.69% | -6.72% | 18.00% |
ZGI.TO BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF | 13.70% | 0.94% | 25.35% | -0.72% | 4.48% | 26.79% | -10.51% | 19.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCRE.TO and ZGI.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HCRE.TO and ZGI.TO has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HCRE.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HCRE.TO
ZGI.TO
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
HCRE.TO
ZGI.TO
Basic Materials
HCRE.TO
-
ZGI.TO
-
Communication Services
HCRE.TO
-
ZGI.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HCRE.TO
-
ZGI.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HCRE.TO
-
ZGI.TO
-
Energy
HCRE.TO
-
ZGI.TO
Financial Services
HCRE.TO
-
ZGI.TO
-
Healthcare
HCRE.TO
-
ZGI.TO
-
Industrials
HCRE.TO
-
ZGI.TO
Technology
HCRE.TO
-
ZGI.TO
-
Utilities
HCRE.TO
-
ZGI.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCRE.TO vs. ZGI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HCRE.TO
ZGI.TO
HCRE.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF (HCRE.TO) and BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCRE.TO | ZGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.73 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 4.81 | +0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCRE.TO | ZGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.95 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.83 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.81 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
HCRE.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.39%, which is greater than ZGI.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCRE.TO and ZGI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCRE.TO | ZGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.39% | -34.76% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -6.66% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.85% | -10.07% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.87% | -16.70% | -16.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -3.37% | +2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.37% | -4.39% | -7.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 2.49% | +0.27% |
Volatility
HCRE.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF (HCRE.TO) is 3.24%, while BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that HCRE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZGI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCRE.TO | ZGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 5.08% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 9.82% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.95% | 12.19% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 13.24% | +4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 15.93% | +5.69% |
HCRE.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCRE.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ZGI.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCRE.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Dividend Comparison
HCRE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCRE.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZGI.TO BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF | 2.32% | 2.72% | 2.75% | 3.25% | 2.94% | 2.98% | 3.66% | 2.78% | 2.92% | 2.53% | 3.21% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCRE.TO and ZGI.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HCRE.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HCRE.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZGI.TO.
HCRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while ZGI.TO is Industrials Equities. HCRE.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index (Total Return), while ZGI.TO tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure North American Listed Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HCRE.TO and 0.61% for ZGI.TO.
Find the right allocation for HCRE.TO and ZGI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer