PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCMPX vs. HFCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCMPX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund (HCMPX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCMPX achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly lower than HFCVX's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, HCMPX has outperformed HFCVX with an annualized return of 15.28%, while HFCVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.15% annualized return.


HCMPX

1D
0.59%
1M
7.66%
YTD
8.02%
6M
7.02%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
24.97%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.28%

HFCVX

1D
0.88%
1M
2.10%
YTD
13.70%
6M
14.88%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCMPX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCMPX
HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund
8.02%15.92%43.56%16.87%-22.96%36.55%27.80%24.02%-14.61%17.02%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
13.70%18.27%9.59%5.81%6.12%29.94%-6.39%20.84%-9.50%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between HCMPX and HFCVX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2015

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between HCMPX and HFCVX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCMPX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCMPX
HCMPX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HCMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
HCMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCVX
HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCMPX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund (HCMPX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCMPXHFCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.51

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

7.07

-4.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.12

21.66

-11.54

HCMPX vs. HFCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCMPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the HFCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCMPX and HFCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCMPXHFCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.91

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.89

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.68

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.41

+0.30

Drawdowns

HCMPX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCMPX drawdown since its inception was -28.88%, smaller than the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMPX and HFCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCMPXHFCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.88%

-65.75%

+36.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-3.77%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.43%

-11.32%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.86%

-16.81%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.88%

-39.39%

+10.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.29%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-8.24%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

1.23%

+1.91%

Volatility

HCMPX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison

HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund (HCMPX) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) at 2.79%. This indicates that HCMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCMPXHFCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

2.79%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

6.85%

+4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.82%

9.16%

+7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

13.26%

+6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.16%

16.46%

+3.70%

HCMPX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCMPX has a 2.38% expense ratio, which is higher than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCMPX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison

HCMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than HFCVX's 6.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCMPX
HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund
0.40%0.43%29.52%5.15%8.57%0.00%0.00%0.15%12.87%8.64%4.18%2.18%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
6.50%7.39%4.56%3.57%10.33%4.81%2.58%6.58%17.16%14.97%2.26%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


HCMPX and HFCVX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HCMPX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to HFCVX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMPX dropped -28.88% vs HFCVX's -65.75%.

HFCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCMPX and HFCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer