HCMPX vs. GQHPX
HCMPX (HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund) and GQHPX (GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, HCMPX returned 24.97%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for GQHPX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HCMPX charges 2.38%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for GQHPX.
Performance
HCMPX vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCMPX achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly lower than GQHPX's 10.15% return.
HCMPX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 7.66%
- YTD
- 8.02%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 30.41%
- 3Y*
- 24.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
GQHPX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 11.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HCMPX vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMPX HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund | 8.02% | 15.92% | 43.56% | 16.87% | -22.96% | 14.21% |
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund | 10.15% | 7.53% | 12.69% | 3.94% | 6.73% | 10.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCMPX and GQHPX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HCMPX and GQHPX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCMPX vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank
HCMPX
GQHPX
HCMPX vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund (HCMPX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCMPX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.20 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.29 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.12 | 5.73 | +4.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCMPX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 1.19 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.84 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
HCMPX vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCMPX drawdown since its inception was -28.88%, which is greater than GQHPX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMPX and GQHPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCMPX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.88% | -17.26% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -5.08% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.43% | -8.71% | -9.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.59% | +3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -3.35% | -4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.03% | +1.11% |
Volatility
HCMPX vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison
HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund (HCMPX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCMPX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 3.49% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 7.72% | +3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.82% | 9.77% | +7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 12.66% | +6.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 12.66% | +7.50% |
HCMPX vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCMPX has a 2.38% expense ratio, which is higher than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCMPX vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison
HCMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than GQHPX's 3.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund | 3.62% | 2.98% | 3.14% | 2.64% | 3.24% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HCMPX HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund | 0.40% | 0.43% | 29.52% | 5.15% | 8.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 12.87% | 8.64% | 4.18% | 2.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCMPX and GQHPX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HCMPX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to GQHPX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMPX dropped -28.88% vs GQHPX's -17.26%.
HCMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HCMPX and GQHPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer