HCAL.TO vs. DXF.TO
HCAL.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF) and DXF.TO (Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. HCAL.TO is passively managed, while DXF.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HCAL.TO returned 24.47%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for DXF.TO. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HCAL.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for DXF.TO.
Performance
HCAL.TO vs. DXF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCAL.TO achieves a 41.03% return, which is significantly higher than DXF.TO's 4.08% return.
HCAL.TO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 42.14%
- YTD
- 41.03%
- 1Y
- 88.97%
- 3Y*
- 43.38%
- 5Y*
- 24.47%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.85%
DXF.TO
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 7.22%
- 3Y*
- 21.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$1.08K | CA$2.16K | CA$8.42K | |
| CA$4.03M | CA$3.86M | CA$4.00M |
HCAL.TO vs. DXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCAL.TO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF | 41.03% | 54.09% | 29.04% | 11.73% | -17.54% | 50.25% | 16.92% |
DXF.TO Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF | 4.08% | 17.12% | 36.17% | 18.06% | -19.33% | 23.02% | 8.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCAL.TO and DXF.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020 | 0.35 |
The correlation between HCAL.TO and DXF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HCAL.TO vs. DXF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HCAL.TO
DXF.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
HCAL.TO
DXF.TO
Basic Materials
HCAL.TO
-
DXF.TO
-
Communication Services
HCAL.TO
-
DXF.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HCAL.TO
-
DXF.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HCAL.TO
-
DXF.TO
-
Energy
HCAL.TO
-
DXF.TO
-
Healthcare
HCAL.TO
-
DXF.TO
-
Industrials
HCAL.TO
-
DXF.TO
Real Estate
HCAL.TO
-
DXF.TO
Technology
HCAL.TO
-
DXF.TO
-
Utilities
HCAL.TO
-
DXF.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCAL.TO vs. DXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HCAL.TO
DXF.TO
HCAL.TO vs. DXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL.TO) and Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF (DXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HCAL.TO | DXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.84 | 1.11 | +0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.34 | 0.51 | +7.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.52 | 1.28 | +33.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HCAL.TO vs. DXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.05%, roughly equal to the maximum DXF.TO drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCAL.TO and DXF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCAL.TO | DXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.05% | -35.27% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.65% | -14.42% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.66% | -14.42% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -29.06% | -5.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.70% | -1.27% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -7.63% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 5.76% | -3.19% |
Volatility
HCAL.TO vs. DXF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF (HCAL.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF (DXF.TO) at 5.41%. This indicates that HCAL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCAL.TO | DXF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 5.41% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 10.13% | +5.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.80% | 12.43% | +5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 16.75% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 22.32% | -5.19% |
HCAL.TO vs. DXF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCAL.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DXF.TO's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCAL.TO vs. DXF.TO - Dividend Comparison
HCAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than DXF.TO's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXF.TO Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF | 1.09% | 1.13% | 1.18% | 2.14% | 1.95% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.40% | 2.08% |
HCAL.TO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Bank ETF | 3.12% | 4.20% | 6.12% | 7.37% | 7.46% | 4.27% | 2.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCAL.TO and DXF.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HCAL.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HCAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for DXF.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Dynamic. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HCAL.TO and 0.84% for DXF.TO.
Find the right allocation for HCAL.TO and DXF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer