DXF.TO vs. DXB.TO
DXF.TO (Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF) and DXB.TO (Dynamic Active Tactical Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXF.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Dynamic, while DXB.TO is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Dynamic. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DXF.TO returned 9.90%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DXB.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXF.TO vs. DXB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXF.TO achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly higher than DXB.TO's 1.82% return.
DXF.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- —
DXB.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 5.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- —
DXF.TO vs. DXB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXF.TO Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF | 3.02% | 17.12% | 36.17% | 18.06% | -19.33% | 23.02% | 9.67% | 42.59% | -8.42% | 5.02% |
DXB.TO Dynamic Active Tactical Bond ETF | 1.82% | 4.44% | 0.76% | 7.43% | -10.77% | -2.77% | 8.57% | 5.19% | 1.46% | 1.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXF.TO and DXB.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXF.TO vs. DXB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXF.TO
DXB.TO
DXF.TO vs. DXB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF (DXF.TO) and Dynamic Active Tactical Bond ETF (DXB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXF.TO | DXB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.26 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 2.70 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 6.69 | -5.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXF.TO vs. DXB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, which is greater than DXB.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXF.TO and DXB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXF.TO | DXB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.27% | -17.90% | -17.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.42% | -2.05% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.42% | -5.11% | -9.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.06% | -15.58% | -13.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.87% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -5.10% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.76% | 0.82% | +4.94% |
Volatility
DXF.TO vs. DXB.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF (DXF.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Dynamic Active Tactical Bond ETF (DXB.TO) at 1.16%. This indicates that DXF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXF.TO | DXB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 1.16% | +3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 3.14% | +6.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 4.00% | +8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 6.51% | +10.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 6.79% | +15.56% |
Dividends
DXF.TO vs. DXB.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than DXB.TO's 4.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXB.TO Dynamic Active Tactical Bond ETF | 4.31% | 4.30% | 4.30% | 3.81% | 2.84% | 2.44% | 2.32% | 2.46% | 2.53% | 0.74% |
DXF.TO Dynamic Active Global Financial Services ETF | 1.10% | 1.13% | 1.18% | 2.14% | 1.95% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.40% | 2.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXF.TO and DXB.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXF.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while DXB.TO is Tactical Allocation.
Find the right allocation for DXF.TO and DXB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer