PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBTE.NEO vs. HDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBTE.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBTE.NEO achieves a 29.23% return, which is significantly higher than HDIV.TO's 16.21% return.


HBTE.NEO

1D
-0.99%
1M
11.29%
YTD
29.23%
6M
10.47%
1Y
68.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDIV.TO

1D
-0.26%
1M
6.14%
YTD
16.21%
6M
17.63%
1Y
45.50%
3Y*
27.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBTE.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HBTE.NEO and HDIV.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBTE.NEO vs. HDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBTE.NEO
HBTE.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HBTE.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

HDIV.TO
HDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBTE.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBTE.NEOHDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.68

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

5.24

-4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.40

25.39

-22.99

HBTE.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBTE.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the HDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBTE.NEO and HDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBTE.NEOHDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

3.67

-2.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

1.26

+0.17

Drawdowns

HBTE.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBTE.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, which is greater than HDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTE.NEO and HDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBTE.NEOHDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.75%

-22.32%

-33.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.75%

-8.73%

-47.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.92%

-0.63%

-23.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.02%

-4.22%

-16.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.52%

1.80%

+26.72%

Volatility

HBTE.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO) has a higher volatility of 15.68% compared to Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) at 3.80%. This indicates that HBTE.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBTE.NEOHDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.68%

3.80%

+11.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.18%

10.29%

+39.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.86%

12.47%

+54.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.79%

15.63%

+51.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.79%

15.63%

+51.16%

HBTE.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBTE.NEO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HDIV.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBTE.NEO vs. HDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBTE.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.89%, more than HDIV.TO's 9.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HBTE.NEO
Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF
25.89%18.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDIV.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF
9.33%10.09%11.38%10.41%9.64%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBTE.NEO and HDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HBTE.NEO.

HBTE.NEO is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while HDIV.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Hamilton ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HBTE.NEO and 0.00% for HDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBTE.NEO and HDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer