HBTE.NEO vs. AVGY.TO
HBTE.NEO (Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF) and AVGY.TO (Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - HBTE.NEO is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Harvest, while AVGY.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBTE.NEO returned 68.12% vs 107.90% for AVGY.TO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBTE.NEO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for AVGY.TO.
Performance
HBTE.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBTE.NEO achieves a 29.23% return, which is significantly lower than AVGY.TO's 42.92% return.
HBTE.NEO
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 11.29%
- YTD
- 29.23%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 68.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 19.17%
- YTD
- 42.92%
- 6M
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 107.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBTE.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBTE.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF | 29.23% | 60.52% |
AVGY.TO Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 42.92% | 91.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBTE.NEO and AVGY.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBTE.NEO vs. AVGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HBTE.NEO
AVGY.TO
HBTE.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO) and Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBTE.NEO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.38 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 3.81 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.40 | 8.81 | -6.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBTE.NEO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.39 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 2.30 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
HBTE.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBTE.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, which is greater than AVGY.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTE.NEO and AVGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBTE.NEO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.75% | -28.78% | -26.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.75% | -28.50% | -27.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.92% | -0.45% | -23.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.02% | -8.43% | -12.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.52% | 12.29% | +16.23% |
Volatility
HBTE.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO) has a higher volatility of 15.68% compared to Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO) at 13.20%. This indicates that HBTE.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBTE.NEO | AVGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.68% | 13.20% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.18% | 33.23% | +16.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.86% | 45.46% | +21.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.79% | 51.13% | +15.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.79% | 51.13% | +15.66% |
HBTE.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBTE.NEO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBTE.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
HBTE.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.89%, more than AVGY.TO's 19.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AVGY.TO Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 19.08% | 14.82% |
HBTE.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF | 25.89% | 18.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBTE.NEO and AVGY.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVGY.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HBTE.NEO.
HBTE.NEO is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while AVGY.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HBTE.NEO and 0.40% for AVGY.TO.
Find the right allocation for HBTE.NEO and AVGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer