HBTC vs. WGMI

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

HBTC (Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF) and WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBTC is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Fortuna Funds, while WGMI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBTC returned -34.86% vs 119.73% for WGMI. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HBTC charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.

Performance

HBTC vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBTC achieves a -22.91% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 34.47% return.

HBTC

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: -0.25%
• 6M: -19.07%
• YTD: -22.91%
• 1Y: -34.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -16.63%

WGMI

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: -3.25%
• 6M: 14.20%
• YTD: 34.47%
• 1Y: 119.73%
• 3Y*: 49.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF	$620.05	$1.99K	$5.81K
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	$36.52M	$32.75M	$41.50M

HBTC vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF	-22.91%	1.18%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	34.47%	168.56%

Correlation

The correlation between HBTC and WGMI is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025	0.51

The correlation between HBTC and WGMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HBTC vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HBTC

HBTC Risk / Return Rank: 1
HBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
HBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
HBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
HBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
HBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 51
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 51
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HBTC vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HBTC	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.30	1.25	-2.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.00	1.95	-3.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.23	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	2.05	-2.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	3.96	-5.40

HBTC vs. WGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBTC Sharpe Ratio is -1.30, which is lower than the WGMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBTC and WGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HBTC vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBTC drawdown since its inception was -40.45%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTC and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBTC	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.45%	-85.76%	+45.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.45%	-50.94%	+10.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-62.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.12%	-28.63%	-10.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.14%	-41.97%	+24.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.22%	26.29%	-1.07%

Volatility

HBTC vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) is 7.39%, while CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 35.22%. This indicates that HBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBTC	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.39%	35.22%	-27.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.26%	61.62%	-43.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.00%	83.14%	-55.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.62%	82.40%	-53.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.62%	82.40%	-53.78%

HBTC vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBTC has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBTC vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

HBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.21%, while WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF	14.21%	10.96%	0.00%	0.00%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBTC and WGMI in my portfolio?

HBTC and WGMI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HBTC or WGMI?

WGMI has higher volatility (35.22%) compared to HBTC (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTC dropped -40.45% vs WGMI's -85.76%.

Which ETF is better, HBTC or WGMI?

On 1-year performance, WGMI leads with 119.73% vs -34.86% for HBTC. On fees, WGMI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HBTC has been the lower-risk option at 7.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HBTC or WGMI?

Over the 1-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 119.73% return vs -34.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBTC or WGMI?

WGMI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for HBTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HBTC or WGMI?

HBTC has the higher dividend yield at 14.21%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.

What is the main difference between HBTC and WGMI?

HBTC is categorized as Blockchain, while WGMI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Fortuna Funds and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for HBTC and 0.75% for WGMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.