HBTC vs. USFR
HBTC (Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - HBTC is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Fortuna Funds, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. HBTC is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. Over the past year, HBTC returned -31.64% vs 4.01% for USFR. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. HBTC charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
HBTC vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBTC achieves a -22.12% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.60% return.
HBTC
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -16.28%
- YTD
- -22.12%
- 6M
- -26.61%
- 1Y
- -31.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
HBTC vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF | -22.12% | 1.24% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.60% | 3.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBTC and USFR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBTC vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
HBTC
USFR
HBTC vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBTC | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -16.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -52.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 13.37 | -12.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 202.38 | -203.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.57 | 783.80 | -785.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBTC | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | 15.01 | -16.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 9.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | 1.60 | -2.21 |
Drawdowns
HBTC vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBTC drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTC and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBTC | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.50% | -1.36% | -37.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.50% | -0.02% | -38.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.50% | 0.00% | -38.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.46% | -0.16% | -14.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.20% | 0.01% | +20.19% |
Volatility
HBTC vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that HBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBTC | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 0.06% | +6.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.99% | 0.18% | +19.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.93% | 0.27% | +28.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.62% | 0.40% | +29.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.62% | 0.81% | +28.81% |
HBTC vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBTC has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBTC vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
HBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.07%, more than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF | 14.07% | 10.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBTC and USFR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HBTC has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTC dropped -38.50% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 1-year performance, USFR leads with 4.01% vs -31.64% for HBTC. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USFR has performed better with a 4.01% return vs -31.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for HBTC.
HBTC has the higher dividend yield at 14.07%, compared with 3.91% for USFR.
HBTC is categorized as Blockchain, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Fortuna Funds and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for HBTC and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.01 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HBTC and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer