HBTC vs. BDRY
HBTC (Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF) and BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBTC is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Fortuna Funds, while BDRY is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. HBTC is actively managed, while BDRY is passively managed. Over the past year, HBTC returned -36.19% vs 74.48% for BDRY. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. HBTC charges 1.75%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for BDRY.
Performance
HBTC vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBTC achieves a -20.50% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 44.24% return.
HBTC
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- 6M
- -24.64%
- YTD
- -20.50%
- 1Y
- -36.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDRY
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- 6M
- 33.44%
- YTD
- 44.24%
- 1Y
- 74.48%
- 3Y*
- 37.75%
- 5Y*
- -12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
HBTC vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF | -20.50% | 1.18% |
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 44.24% | 30.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBTC and BDRY is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBTC vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank
HBTC
BDRY
HBTC vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBTC | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.29 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 3.47 | -4.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | 9.43 | -10.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBTC vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBTC drawdown since its inception was -40.45%, smaller than the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTC and BDRY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBTC | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.45% | -89.16% | +48.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.45% | -21.60% | -18.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -69.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.22% | -69.53% | +32.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -58.52% | +42.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.99% | 7.92% | +16.07% |
Volatility
HBTC vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) is 6.05%, while Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) has a volatility of 10.05%. This indicates that HBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBTC | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 10.05% | -4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.21% | 29.47% | -10.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.93% | 41.13% | -13.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.84% | 59.91% | -31.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.84% | 62.24% | -33.40% |
HBTC vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBTC has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBTC vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison
HBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.78%, while BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF | 13.78% | 10.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBTC and BDRY have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDRY has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to HBTC (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTC dropped -40.45% vs BDRY's -89.16%.
On 1-year performance, BDRY leads with 74.48% vs -36.19% for HBTC. On fees, HBTC is cheaper at 1.75% per year. On volatility, HBTC has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BDRY has performed better with a 74.48% return vs -36.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HBTC is cheaper with a 1.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.
HBTC has the higher dividend yield at 13.78%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.
HBTC is categorized as Blockchain, while BDRY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Fortuna Funds and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for HBTC and 3.76% for BDRY.
BDRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HBTC and BDRY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer