HBTC vs. BDRY
HBTC (Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF) and BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBTC is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Fortuna Funds, while BDRY is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. HBTC is actively managed, while BDRY is passively managed. Over the past year, HBTC returned -32.24% vs 103.63% for BDRY. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. HBTC charges 1.75%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for BDRY.
Performance
HBTC vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBTC achieves a -24.27% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 34.21% return.
HBTC
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -13.17%
- YTD
- -24.27%
- 6M
- -24.71%
- 1Y
- -32.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDRY
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -7.14%
- YTD
- 34.21%
- 6M
- 34.67%
- 1Y
- 103.63%
- 3Y*
- 24.09%
- 5Y*
- -16.41%
- 10Y*
- —
HBTC vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF | -24.27% | 1.18% |
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 34.21% | 30.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBTC and BDRY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBTC vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank
HBTC
BDRY
HBTC vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBTC | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.36 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 4.82 | -5.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 13.59 | -15.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBTC vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBTC drawdown since its inception was -40.19%, smaller than the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTC and BDRY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBTC | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.19% | -89.16% | +48.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.19% | -21.60% | -18.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -69.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.19% | -71.65% | +31.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.35% | -58.43% | +43.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.93% | 7.65% | +14.28% |
Volatility
HBTC vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) is 5.26%, while Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that HBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBTC | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 7.30% | -2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.47% | 29.14% | -9.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.29% | 42.10% | -13.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.10% | 60.24% | -31.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.10% | 62.40% | -33.30% |
HBTC vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBTC has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBTC vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison
HBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.47%, while BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF | 14.47% | 10.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBTC and BDRY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDRY has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to HBTC (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTC dropped -40.19% vs BDRY's -89.16%.
On 1-year performance, BDRY leads with 103.63% vs -32.24% for HBTC. On fees, HBTC is cheaper at 1.75% per year. On volatility, HBTC has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BDRY has performed better with a 103.63% return vs -32.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HBTC is cheaper with a 1.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.
HBTC has the higher dividend yield at 14.47%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.
HBTC is categorized as Blockchain, while BDRY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Fortuna Funds and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for HBTC and 3.76% for BDRY.
BDRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HBTC and BDRY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer