HBTA vs. YCS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HBTA (Horizon Expedition Plus ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - HBTA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Horizon, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). HBTA is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past year, HBTA returned 31.71% vs 31.27% for YCS. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBTA charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

HBTA vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HBTA having a 10.13% return and YCS slightly lower at 9.63%.

HBTA

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 31.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YCS

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 3.57%
• YTD: 9.63%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 31.27%
• 3Y*: 18.37%
• 5Y*: 23.52%
• 10Y*: 13.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBTA vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF	10.13%	14.96%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	9.63%	6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HBTA and YCS is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025	0.03

The correlation between HBTA and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HBTA vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBTA

HBTA Risk / Return Rank: 57
HBTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
HBTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
HBTA Omega Ratio Rank: 54
HBTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
HBTA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 63
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 59
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBTA vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HBTA	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.86	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	2.36	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.34	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	3.78	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.93	11.93	-1.00

HBTA vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBTA Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBTA and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HBTA vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBTA drawdown since its inception was -26.73%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTA and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBTA	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.73%	-49.56%	+22.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.18%	-8.30%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.10%	-0.14%	-3.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-19.87%	+15.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	2.65%	+0.26%

Volatility

HBTA vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) has a higher volatility of 7.25% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that HBTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBTA	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.25%	2.25%	+5.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.61%	12.19%	+2.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.28%	16.93%	+1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.04%	21.10%	+3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.04%	18.82%	+6.22%

HBTA vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBTA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBTA vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

HBTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF	0.58%	0.64%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBTA and YCS in my portfolio?

HBTA and YCS have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HBTA or YCS?

HBTA has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTA dropped -26.73% vs YCS's -49.56%.

Which ETF is better, HBTA or YCS?

On 1-year performance, HBTA leads with 31.71% vs 31.27% for YCS. On fees, HBTA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HBTA or YCS?

Over the 1-year period, HBTA has performed better with a 31.71% return vs 31.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBTA or YCS?

HBTA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HBTA or YCS?

HBTA has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

What is the main difference between HBTA and YCS?

HBTA is categorized as Derivative Income, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Horizon and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HBTA and 1.00% for YCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.