HBTA vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

HBTA (Horizon Expedition Plus ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBTA returned 27.18% vs 120.64% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. HBTA charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

HBTA vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBTA achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 10.13% return.

HBTA

• 1D: -1.62%
• 1M: 0.93%
• 6M: 9.32%
• YTD: 11.62%
• 1Y: 27.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 18.08%
• 6M: 14.43%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 1Y: 120.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBTA vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF	11.62%	29.77%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	10.13%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between HBTA and WNTR is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.48

Return for Risk

HBTA vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBTA

HBTA Risk / Return Rank: 55
HBTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
HBTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
HBTA Omega Ratio Rank: 53
HBTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
HBTA Martin Ratio Rank: 64

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 70
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBTA vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HBTA	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	2.26	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.47	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.34	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	2.84	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.11	7.31	+1.80

HBTA vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBTA Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBTA and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HBTA vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBTA drawdown since its inception was -26.73%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTA and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBTA	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.73%	-42.65%	+15.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.18%	-42.65%	+29.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.80%	-10.15%	+7.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-20.53%	+16.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	16.58%	-13.59%

Volatility

HBTA vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA) is 6.66%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.84%. This indicates that HBTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBTA	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.66%	18.84%	-12.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.04%	47.46%	-32.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.48%	53.83%	-35.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.83%	53.56%	-28.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.83%	53.56%	-28.73%

HBTA vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBTA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBTA vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

HBTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than WNTR's 102.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF	0.57%	0.64%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	102.14%	58.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBTA and WNTR in my portfolio?

HBTA and WNTR have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HBTA or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.84%) compared to HBTA (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTA dropped -26.73% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, HBTA or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 120.64% vs 27.18% for HBTA. On fees, HBTA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, HBTA has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HBTA or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 120.64% return vs 27.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBTA or WNTR?

HBTA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HBTA or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.14%, compared with 0.57% for HBTA.

What is the main difference between HBTA and WNTR?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HBTA and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.