PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBT vs. BITC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBT vs. BITC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBT achieves a 13.82% return, which is significantly higher than BITC's 7.07% return.


HBT

1D
1.05%
1M
3.85%
YTD
13.82%
6M
19.85%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
18.26%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*

BITC

1D
0.12%
1M
-5.76%
YTD
7.07%
6M
2.87%
1Y
-15.03%
3Y*
36.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBT vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HBT
HBT Financial, Inc.
13.82%22.23%7.74%6.36%
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
7.07%-20.46%97.86%42.29%

Correlation

The correlation between HBT and BITC is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBT vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBT
HBT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
HBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBT vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBTBITCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.90

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

-0.57

+2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.87

-0.82

+5.69

HBT vs. BITC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBT Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the BITC Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBT and BITC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBTBITCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

-0.59

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.68

-0.28

Drawdowns

HBT vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBT drawdown since its inception was -53.95%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBT and BITC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBTBITCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.95%

-38.51%

-15.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-26.51%

+13.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.67%

-38.51%

+19.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-26.41%

+26.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-16.40%

+4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.99%

18.46%

-12.47%

Volatility

HBT vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison

HBT Financial, Inc. (HBT) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) at 5.93%. This indicates that HBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBTBITCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

5.93%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.31%

19.98%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.89%

25.54%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.97%

46.60%

-17.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.37%

46.60%

-11.23%

Dividends

HBT vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison

HBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than BITC's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.14%3.36%42.68%5.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HBT
HBT Financial, Inc.
3.04%3.25%3.47%3.22%3.27%3.20%3.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBT and BITC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HBT has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to BITC (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBT dropped -53.95% vs BITC's -38.51%.

HBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBT and BITC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer