PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBNK.TO vs. USCL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HBNK.TO vs. USCL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HBNK.TO vs. USCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HBNK.TO
Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
3.35%43.71%24.77%8.99%
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
-1.75%10.03%38.54%5.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBNK.TO achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than USCL.TO's -1.75% return.


HBNK.TO

1D
1.37%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
3.35%
6M
15.73%
1Y
54.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USCL.TO

1D
0.55%
1M
-3.02%
YTD
-1.75%
6M
-0.25%
1Y
13.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HBNK.TO vs. USCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBNK.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than USCL.TO's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

HBNK.TO vs. USCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBNK.TO
HBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

USCL.TO
USCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBNK.TO vs. USCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBNK.TOUSCL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.03

0.67

+3.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.12

1.05

+4.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.17

+0.61

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.44

0.88

+5.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

25.18

3.65

+21.52

HBNK.TO vs. USCL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.03, which is higher than the USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBNK.TO and USCL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBNK.TOUSCL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.03

0.67

+3.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.36

1.13

+1.23

Correlation

The correlation between HBNK.TO and USCL.TO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HBNK.TO vs. USCL.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than USCL.TO's 13.40% yield.


TTM202520242023
HBNK.TO
Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
3.19%3.24%4.15%2.45%
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
13.40%12.94%11.57%7.08%

Drawdowns

HBNK.TO vs. USCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBNK.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, smaller than the maximum USCL.TO drawdown of -21.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBNK.TO and USCL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HBNK.TOUSCL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.78%

-21.85%

+7.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-14.94%

+6.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.49%

-5.01%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-2.66%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

3.62%

-1.45%

Volatility

HBNK.TO vs. USCL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) have volatilities of 5.96% and 6.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HBNK.TOUSCL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

6.20%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

10.04%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

20.30%

-6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.47%

15.74%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.47%

15.74%

-3.27%