HBNK.TO vs. CLSA.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO).

HBNK.TO and CLSA.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HBNK.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. It was launched on Jul 5, 2023. CLSA.TO is an actively managed fund by Brompton Funds. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025.

Performance

HBNK.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HBNK.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	3.35%	49.52%
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	-0.37%	56.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBNK.TO achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than CLSA.TO's -0.37% return.

HBNK.TO

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 3.35%
• 6M: 15.73%
• 1Y: 54.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLSA.TO

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: -0.37%
• 6M: 16.58%
• 1Y: 56.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBNK.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBNK.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSA.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

CLSA.TO

Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF

HBNK.TO

Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Return for Risk

HBNK.TO vs. CLSA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBNK.TO

HBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 98
HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
HBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
HBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
HBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
HBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

CLSA.TO

CLSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CLSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBNK.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HBNK.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.03	3.34	+0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.12	3.91	+1.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.79	1.66	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.44	5.26	+1.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	25.18	20.94	+4.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HBNK.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.03, which is comparable to the CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBNK.TO and CLSA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBNK.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.03	3.34	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.36	3.19	-0.82

Correlation

The correlation between HBNK.TO and CLSA.TO is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HBNK.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than CLSA.TO's 11.56% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	3.19%	3.24%	4.15%	2.45%
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	11.56%	7.99%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HBNK.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBNK.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, which is greater than CLSA.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBNK.TO and CLSA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBNK.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.78%	-11.73%	-3.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.48%	-10.78%	+2.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.49%	-6.70%	+2.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.41%	-1.46%	-0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	2.71%	-0.54%

Volatility

HBNK.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) is 5.96%, while Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that HBNK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBNK.TO	CLSA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.96%	9.17%	-3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.04%	12.04%	-2.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.56%	17.07%	-3.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.47%	17.03%	-4.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.47%	17.03%	-4.56%