PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBND.TO vs. XTLH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HBND.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBND.TO) and iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XTLH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HBND.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HBND.TO
Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)
-1.01%4.05%-7.02%4.80%
XTLH.TO
iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
-0.26%2.61%-9.55%7.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBND.TO achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than XTLH.TO's -0.26% return.


HBND.TO

1D
-0.72%
1M
-4.53%
YTD
-1.01%
6M
-1.85%
1Y
-1.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTLH.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.38%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
-1.65%
1Y
-2.02%
3Y*
-3.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HBND.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBND.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XTLH.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HBND.TO vs. XTLH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBND.TO
HBND.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HBND.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBND.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBND.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
HBND.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBND.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XTLH.TO
XTLH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XTLH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTLH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTLH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XTLH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTLH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBND.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBND.TO) and iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XTLH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBND.TOXTLH.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.13

-0.18

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.11

-0.17

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.98

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

-0.13

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.16

-0.26

+0.11

HBND.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBND.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is comparable to the XTLH.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBND.TO and XTLH.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBND.TOXTLH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

-0.18

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

-0.14

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between HBND.TO and XTLH.TO is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HBND.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBND.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.88%, more than XTLH.TO's 4.52% yield.


Drawdowns

HBND.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBND.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.65%, smaller than the maximum XTLH.TO drawdown of -22.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBND.TO and XTLH.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HBND.TOXTLH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.65%

-22.72%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-9.30%

+0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.67%

-14.14%

+5.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.39%

-12.00%

+5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

4.66%

-0.71%

Volatility

HBND.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBND.TO) is 3.46%, while iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XTLH.TO) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that HBND.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTLH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HBND.TOXTLH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.65%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.93%

6.35%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.30%

11.23%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.57%

14.42%

-2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.57%

14.42%

-2.85%