HBKS.L vs. IGLH.L
HBKS.L (HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD) and IGLH.L (iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) are both Global Bonds funds - HBKS.L tracks the FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index while IGLH.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Both are passively managed. HBKS.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IGLH.L.
Performance
HBKS.L vs. IGLH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HBKS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGLH.L
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 1.44%
- 3Y*
- 2.12%
- 5Y*
- -1.19%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBKS.L vs. IGLH.L — Risk / Return Rank
HBKS.L
IGLH.L
HBKS.L vs. IGLH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IGLH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBKS.L | IGLH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.06 | — |
Drawdowns
HBKS.L vs. IGLH.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBKS.L | IGLH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -18.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -9.55% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.33% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.21% | — |
Volatility
HBKS.L vs. IGLH.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBKS.L | IGLH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.51% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 5.62% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 4.92% | — |
HBKS.L vs. IGLH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBKS.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLH.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBKS.L vs. IGLH.L - Dividend Comparison
HBKS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGLH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBKS.L HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGLH.L iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 2.99% | 2.91% | 2.33% | 1.40% | 0.73% | 0.55% | 0.97% | 1.19% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IGLH.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGLH.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBKS.L.
HBKS.L tracks FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index, while IGLH.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HBKS.L and 0.25% for IGLH.L.
Find the right allocation for HBKS.L and IGLH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer