HBKS.L vs. AEGG.L
HBKS.L (HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD) and AEGG.L (iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) are both Global Bonds funds - HBKS.L tracks the FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index while AEGG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HBKS.L returned 5.15% vs 3.22% for AEGG.L. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. HBKS.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for AEGG.L.
Performance
HBKS.L vs. AEGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBKS.L achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly higher than AEGG.L's 0.49% return.
HBKS.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEGG.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBKS.L vs. AEGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HBKS.L HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD | 0.69% | -0.34% | 4.48% | 1.79% |
AEGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 0.49% | 4.36% | 3.07% | 4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBKS.L and AEGG.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBKS.L vs. AEGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
HBKS.L
AEGG.L
HBKS.L vs. AEGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBKS.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.18 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.33 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.08 | 3.82 | -1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBKS.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.01 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | -0.05 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
HBKS.L vs. AEGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBKS.L drawdown since its inception was -8.09%, smaller than the maximum AEGG.L drawdown of -15.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBKS.L and AEGG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBKS.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -15.75% | +7.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.33% | -2.38% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -1.36% | -1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -7.54% | +5.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 0.83% | +1.63% |
Volatility
HBKS.L vs. AEGG.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L) has a higher volatility of 1.91% compared to iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) at 1.42%. This indicates that HBKS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBKS.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 1.42% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.27% | 2.48% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.00% | 3.13% | +3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 4.59% | +2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 4.59% | +2.34% |
HBKS.L vs. AEGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBKS.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than AEGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBKS.L vs. AEGG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HBKS.L nor AEGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HBKS.L and AEGG.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AEGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AEGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBKS.L.
HBKS.L tracks FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index, while AEGG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HBKS.L and 0.10% for AEGG.L.
Find the right allocation for HBKS.L and AEGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer