HBIX.NEO vs. BTCC.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO).

HBIX.NEO and BTCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HBIX.NEO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Apr 28, 2025. BTCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Nov 9, 2021.

Performance

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	-24.07%	-6.82%
BTCC.TO Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units	-23.14%	-9.02%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HBIX.NEO having a -24.07% return and BTCC.TO slightly higher at -23.14%.

HBIX.NEO

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: -24.07%
• 6M: -46.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCC.TO

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: -23.14%
• 6M: -43.13%
• 1Y: -22.75%
• 3Y*: 29.94%
• 5Y*: -0.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBIX.NEO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCC.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.

BTCC.TO

Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units

HBIX.NEO

Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF

Return for Risk

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC.TO

BTCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5
BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BTCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BTCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BTCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BTCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBIX.NEO	BTCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.60	0.06	-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between HBIX.NEO and BTCC.TO is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBIX.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.84%, while BTCC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF	37.84%	20.21%
BTCC.TO Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HBIX.NEO vs. BTCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.90%, smaller than the maximum BTCC.TO drawdown of -77.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIX.NEO and BTCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBIX.NEO	BTCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.90%	-77.80%	+21.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-50.04%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-77.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.72%	-46.79%	-2.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.91%	-34.41%	+14.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HBIX.NEO	BTCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.86%	44.84%	+8.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.86%	56.97%	-4.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.86%	57.41%	-4.55%