HBIE.TO vs. MGRW.TO
HBIE.TO (Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF) and MGRW.TO (Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBIE.TO returned 15.23% vs 23.31% for MGRW.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HBIE.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBIE.TO achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly lower than MGRW.TO's 10.77% return.
HBIE.TO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 15.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MGRW.TO
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 8.14%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 1Y
- 23.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- —
HBIE.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HBIE.TO Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF | 7.09% | 10.30% | 6.94% |
MGRW.TO Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF | 10.77% | 18.19% | 14.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBIE.TO and MGRW.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2024 | 0.45 |
The correlation between HBIE.TO and MGRW.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBIE.TO vs. MGRW.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HBIE.TO
MGRW.TO
HBIE.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF (HBIE.TO) and Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBIE.TO | MGRW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.47 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.49 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.42 | 14.04 | -1.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBIE.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBIE.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, smaller than the maximum MGRW.TO drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIE.TO and MGRW.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBIE.TO | MGRW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -17.20% | +6.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.24% | -6.72% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -1.08% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -3.32% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 1.67% | -0.44% |
Volatility
HBIE.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF (HBIE.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO) at 2.41%. This indicates that HBIE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGRW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBIE.TO | MGRW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 2.41% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 8.45% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.85% | 10.23% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.67% | 10.76% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.67% | 10.48% | -0.81% |
Dividends
HBIE.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Dividend Comparison
HBIE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.95%, more than MGRW.TO's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBIE.TO Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF | 9.95% | 10.12% | 7.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGRW.TO Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF | 1.71% | 1.84% | 1.93% | 2.28% | 2.44% | 1.77% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBIE.TO and MGRW.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Mackenzie.
Find the right allocation for HBIE.TO and MGRW.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer