PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBIE.TO vs. HHL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBIE.TO vs. HHL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF (HBIE.TO) and Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBIE.TO achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly higher than HHL.TO's -3.60% return.


HBIE.TO

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.41%
6M
6.46%
YTD
7.09%
1Y
15.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HHL.TO

1D
0.14%
1M
2.73%
6M
-5.81%
YTD
-3.60%
1Y
9.75%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
6.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBIE.TO vs. HHL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HBIE.TO
Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF
7.09%10.30%6.94%
HHL.TO
Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF
-3.60%10.47%1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between HBIE.TO and HHL.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBIE.TO vs. HHL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBIE.TO
HBIE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HBIE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBIE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBIE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HBIE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBIE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

HHL.TO
HHL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
HHL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
HHL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBIE.TO vs. HHL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF (HBIE.TO) and Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HBIE.TOHHL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.12

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

0.76

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

1.70

+10.72

HBIE.TO vs. HHL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBIE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the HHL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBIE.TO and HHL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HBIE.TO vs. HHL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBIE.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, smaller than the maximum HHL.TO drawdown of -26.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIE.TO and HHL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBIE.TOHHL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-26.70%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.24%

-12.88%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-6.76%

+5.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-6.23%

+4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

5.75%

-4.52%

Volatility

HBIE.TO vs. HHL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF (HBIE.TO) is 2.60%, while Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL.TO) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that HBIE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HHL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBIE.TOHHL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

5.43%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

11.34%

-3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.85%

15.42%

-6.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.67%

14.32%

-4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.67%

15.82%

-6.15%

Dividends

HBIE.TO vs. HHL.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBIE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.95%, less than HHL.TO's 10.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HBIE.TO
Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF
9.95%10.12%7.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HHL.TO
Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF
10.21%9.36%9.27%8.71%8.51%7.91%9.02%8.65%9.00%8.45%8.83%8.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBIE.TO and HHL.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HBIE.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while HHL.TO is Health & Biotech Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBIE.TO and HHL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer