HBIE.TO vs. CEQT.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HBIE.TO (Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF) and CEQT.TO (CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBIE.TO returned 15.23% vs 28.62% for CEQT.TO. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HBIE.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF (HBIE.TO) and CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBIE.TO achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly lower than CEQT.TO's 13.87% return.

HBIE.TO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.41%
• 6M: 6.46%
• YTD: 7.09%
• 1Y: 15.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEQT.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.24%
• 6M: 9.95%
• YTD: 13.87%
• 1Y: 28.62%
• 3Y*: 21.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBIE.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HBIE.TO Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF	7.09%	10.30%	6.94%
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF	13.87%	18.84%	18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between HBIE.TO and CEQT.TO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2024	0.28

Return for Risk

HBIE.TO vs. CEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBIE.TO

HBIE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 71
HBIE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
HBIE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
HBIE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
HBIE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
HBIE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

CEQT.TO

CEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
CEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBIE.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF (HBIE.TO) and CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HBIE.TO	CEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.60	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	4.11	-1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.81	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	3.97	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.42	15.66	-3.24

HBIE.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBIE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the CEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBIE.TO and CEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HBIE.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBIE.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, smaller than the maximum CEQT.TO drawdown of -14.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIE.TO and CEQT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBIE.TO	CEQT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-14.02%	+3.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.24%	-7.26%	+2.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	-1.33%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-1.17%	-0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.23%	1.83%	-0.60%

Volatility

HBIE.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF (HBIE.TO) is 2.60%, while CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that HBIE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBIE.TO	CEQT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	2.87%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.51%	9.09%	-1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.85%	11.09%	-2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.67%	13.03%	-3.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.67%	13.03%	-3.36%

Dividends

HBIE.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBIE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.95%, more than CEQT.TO's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF	1.09%	1.25%	1.82%	1.06%
HBIE.TO Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF	9.95%	10.12%	7.56%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBIE.TO and CEQT.TO in my portfolio?

HBIE.TO and CEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between HBIE.TO and CEQT.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Harvest and CI.