HBGD.TO vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HBGD.TO (Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBGD.TO is a Global Equities fund managed by Global X, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Over the past 5 years, HBGD.TO returned 61.94%/yr vs 32.85%/yr for QTUM. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HBGD.TO charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HBGD.TO is traded in CAD, while QTUM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTUM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBGD.TO achieves a 82.51% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's 55.24% return.

HBGD.TO

• 1D: -1.98%
• 1M: 29.31%
• YTD: 82.51%
• 6M: 82.99%
• 1Y: 184.36%
• 3Y*: 67.20%
• 5Y*: 61.94%
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 26.10%
• YTD: 55.24%
• 6M: 50.11%
• 1Y: 97.88%
• 3Y*: 53.99%
• 5Y*: 32.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF	82.51%	53.48%	15.92%	129.66%	-56.87%	375.98%	117.21%	41.31%	-24.43%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	55.24%	30.38%	63.48%	36.78%	-23.73%	33.96%	39.65%	40.71%	-16.14%

Correlation

The correlation between HBGD.TO and QTUM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018	0.50

Over the past year, HBGD.TO and QTUM have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.

HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HBGD.TO	QTUM
Technology	68.7%	84.2%
Financial Services	24.9%	-
Real Estate	4.4%	-
Communication Services	2.0%	5.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.7%
Industrials	-	9.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HBGD.TO vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBGD.TO

HBGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
HBGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HBGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
HBGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
HBGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
HBGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 91
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HBGD.TO	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.84	3.82	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.92	4.45	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.58	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.40	7.29	+1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.05	25.13	-0.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBGD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.84, which is comparable to the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 3.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBGD.TO and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBGD.TO	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.84	3.82	+1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	1.34	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.74	1.20	-1.94

Drawdowns

HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -32.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBGD.TO and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBGD.TO	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-32.77%	-67.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.09%	-13.51%	-8.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.68%	-25.62%	-13.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.43%	-32.77%	-30.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.97%	-0.18%	-99.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-99.99%	-7.27%	-92.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.39%	3.91%	+3.48%

Volatility

HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.31% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 9.79%. This indicates that HBGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBGD.TO	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.31%	9.79%	+3.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.67%	19.94%	+8.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.34%	25.78%	+12.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	96.54%	24.68%	+71.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	87.39%	25.01%	+62.38%

HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBGD.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

HBGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than QTUM's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF	0.21%	0.39%	0.53%	0.64%	1.22%	0.83%	0.32%	1.52%	0.68%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.70%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBGD.TO and QTUM in my portfolio?

HBGD.TO and QTUM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HBGD.TO or QTUM?

On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBGD.TO or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for HBGD.TO.

What is the main difference between HBGD.TO and QTUM?

HBGD.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for HBGD.TO and 0.40% for QTUM.