HBGD.TO vs. QTUM
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM).
HBGD.TO and QTUM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HBGD.TO is managed by Global X. QTUM is a passively managed fund by Defiance that tracks the performance of the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. It was launched on Sep 5, 2018.
Performance
HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF | -0.49% | 53.48% | 15.92% | 129.66% | -56.87% | 375.98% | 117.21% | 41.31% | -24.43% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | -0.63% | 30.38% | 63.48% | 36.78% | -23.73% | 33.96% | 39.65% | 40.71% | -16.14% |
Different Trading Currencies
HBGD.TO is traded in CAD, while QTUM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTUM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBGD.TO achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's -0.63% return.
HBGD.TO
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -11.13%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 84.40%
- 3Y*
- 43.43%
- 5Y*
- 38.80%
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- 4.91%
- 1M
- -6.24%
- YTD
- -0.63%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 40.89%
- 3Y*
- 34.64%
- 5Y*
- 20.87%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBGD.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HBGD.TO vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
HBGD.TO
QTUM
HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBGD.TO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 1.40 | +0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 1.97 | +0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 2.79 | +0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.78 | 9.03 | +1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBGD.TO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 1.40 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.86 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.77 | 0.94 | -1.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between HBGD.TO and QTUM is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
HBGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than QTUM's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.53% | 0.64% | 1.22% | 0.83% | 0.32% | 1.52% | 0.68% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 1.09% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Drawdowns
HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -32.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBGD.TO and QTUM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBGD.TO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -38.45% | -61.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.09% | -15.26% | -6.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.43% | -38.45% | -24.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -11.00% | -88.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -8.40% | -91.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.54% | 4.32% | +3.22% |
Volatility
HBGD.TO vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.09% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 10.08%. This indicates that HBGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HBGD.TO | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.09% | 10.08% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.05% | 20.55% | +8.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.10% | 29.21% | +10.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.43% | 24.31% | +72.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.08% | 24.85% | +63.23% |