PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBFBX vs. HDOGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX) and Hennessy Total Return Fund (HDOGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBFBX achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly higher than HDOGX's 3.26% return. Over the past 10 years, HBFBX has underperformed HDOGX with an annualized return of 5.95%, while HDOGX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.54% annualized return.


HBFBX

1D
0.23%
1M
2.47%
YTD
5.73%
6M
5.32%
1Y
12.67%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
5.95%

HDOGX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.61%
YTD
3.26%
6M
2.57%
1Y
11.33%
3Y*
10.14%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
6.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HBFBX
Hennessy Balanced Fund
5.73%9.90%4.81%7.62%3.83%8.07%-2.98%9.71%0.06%8.34%
HDOGX
Hennessy Total Return Fund
3.26%14.31%2.89%8.07%6.68%11.80%-4.79%12.56%0.08%11.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HBFBX and HDOGX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 1998

0.97

The correlation between HBFBX and HDOGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBFBX vs. HDOGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBFBX
HBFBX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HBFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HBFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

HDOGX
HDOGX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
HDOGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDOGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDOGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
HDOGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDOGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX) and Hennessy Total Return Fund (HDOGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBFBXHDOGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.26

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

2.02

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

4.78

+5.44

HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBFBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the HDOGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBFBX and HDOGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBFBXHDOGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

1.49

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.68

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.56

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.38

+0.10

Drawdowns

HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBFBX drawdown since its inception was -41.61%, smaller than the maximum HDOGX drawdown of -53.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBFBX and HDOGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBFBXHDOGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.61%

-53.25%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-5.67%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

-7.97%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

-14.84%

+4.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.24%

-25.37%

+8.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-4.84%

+4.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-6.83%

+2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

2.39%

-1.14%

Volatility

HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX) is 1.78%, while Hennessy Total Return Fund (HDOGX) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that HBFBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDOGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBFBXHDOGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

2.34%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

5.91%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.54%

7.67%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.23%

10.09%

-2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.14%

11.70%

-3.56%

HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBFBX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HDOGX's 1.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Dividend Comparison

HBFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than HDOGX's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HBFBX
Hennessy Balanced Fund
1.77%1.90%5.40%4.62%9.50%3.79%0.95%5.20%5.51%7.62%7.76%2.53%
HDOGX
Hennessy Total Return Fund
2.11%2.17%3.80%7.55%11.88%1.35%8.29%1.72%4.91%12.76%1.17%11.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, HBFBX and HDOGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HDOGX has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to HBFBX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBFBX dropped -41.61% vs HDOGX's -53.25%.

HBFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBFBX and HDOGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer