HBFBX vs. HDOGX
HBFBX (Hennessy Balanced Fund) and HDOGX (Hennessy Total Return Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Hennessy. Over the past 10 years, HBFBX returned 5.95%/yr vs 6.54%/yr for HDOGX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HBFBX charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.77%/yr for HDOGX.
Performance
HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBFBX achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly higher than HDOGX's 3.26% return. Over the past 10 years, HBFBX has underperformed HDOGX with an annualized return of 5.95%, while HDOGX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.54% annualized return.
HBFBX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 5.73%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- 12.67%
- 3Y*
- 9.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 5.95%
HDOGX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 11.33%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 6.54%
HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBFBX Hennessy Balanced Fund | 5.73% | 9.90% | 4.81% | 7.62% | 3.83% | 8.07% | -2.98% | 9.71% | 0.06% | 8.34% |
HDOGX Hennessy Total Return Fund | 3.26% | 14.31% | 2.89% | 8.07% | 6.68% | 11.80% | -4.79% | 12.56% | 0.08% | 11.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBFBX and HDOGX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 1998 | 0.97 |
The correlation between HBFBX and HDOGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBFBX vs. HDOGX — Risk / Return Rank
HBFBX
HDOGX
HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX) and Hennessy Total Return Fund (HDOGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBFBX | HDOGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.26 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 2.02 | +1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.22 | 4.78 | +5.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBFBX | HDOGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 1.49 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.68 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.56 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.38 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBFBX drawdown since its inception was -41.61%, smaller than the maximum HDOGX drawdown of -53.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBFBX and HDOGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBFBX | HDOGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.61% | -53.25% | +11.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.20% | -5.67% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.10% | -7.97% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.22% | -14.84% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.24% | -25.37% | +8.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -4.84% | +4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -6.83% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 2.39% | -1.14% |
Volatility
HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hennessy Balanced Fund (HBFBX) is 1.78%, while Hennessy Total Return Fund (HDOGX) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that HBFBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDOGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBFBX | HDOGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 2.34% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.14% | 5.91% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.54% | 7.67% | -2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.23% | 10.09% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.14% | 11.70% | -3.56% |
HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBFBX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HDOGX's 1.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBFBX vs. HDOGX - Dividend Comparison
HBFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than HDOGX's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBFBX Hennessy Balanced Fund | 1.77% | 1.90% | 5.40% | 4.62% | 9.50% | 3.79% | 0.95% | 5.20% | 5.51% | 7.62% | 7.76% | 2.53% |
HDOGX Hennessy Total Return Fund | 2.11% | 2.17% | 3.80% | 7.55% | 11.88% | 1.35% | 8.29% | 1.72% | 4.91% | 12.76% | 1.17% | 11.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, HBFBX and HDOGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HDOGX has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to HBFBX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBFBX dropped -41.61% vs HDOGX's -53.25%.
HBFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HBFBX and HDOGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer