HBF.TO vs. ZPH.TO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

HBF.TO (Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)) and ZPH.TO (BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HBF.TO returned 6.86%/yr vs 5.84%/yr for ZPH.TO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HBF.TO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ZPH.TO.

Performance

HBF.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO) and BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBF.TO achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly higher than ZPH.TO's 2.64% return.

HBF.TO

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -1.83%
• 6M: 4.82%
• YTD: 5.50%
• 1Y: 17.58%
• 3Y*: 12.46%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

ZPH.TO

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.47%
• 6M: 3.15%
• YTD: 2.64%
• 1Y: 8.71%
• 3Y*: 7.98%
• 5Y*: 5.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBF.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HBF.TO Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)	5.50%	15.51%	13.12%	11.23%	-14.97%	21.90%	11.44%	26.02%	-4.69%	16.49%
ZPH.TO BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF	2.64%	9.47%	4.21%	22.61%	-10.37%	13.57%	2.43%	3.22%	-6.77%	3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between HBF.TO and ZPH.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017	0.54

The correlation between HBF.TO and ZPH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HBF.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HBF.TO	ZPH.TO
Technology	33.6%	42.2%
Financial Services	18.9%	17.2%
Consumer Defensive	13.8%	8.3%
Communication Services	9.9%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	2.7%
Industrials	5.1%	6.8%
Healthcare	4.9%	17.1%
Energy	4.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HBF.TO vs. ZPH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBF.TO

HBF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 60
HBF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
HBF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
HBF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
HBF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
HBF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

ZPH.TO

ZPH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 44
ZPH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ZPH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ZPH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ZPH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ZPH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBF.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO) and BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HBF.TO	ZPH.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.34	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	1.95	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.25	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	1.44	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.92	5.44	+2.48

HBF.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the ZPH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBF.TO and ZPH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HBF.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBF.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, which is greater than ZPH.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBF.TO and ZPH.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBF.TO	ZPH.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.27%	-33.38%	-1.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.79%	-6.07%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.25%	-11.83%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.69%	-18.38%	-5.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.56%	0.00%	-3.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.72%	-4.23%	-2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	1.60%	+0.62%

Volatility

HBF.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO) at 2.42%. This indicates that HBF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBF.TO	ZPH.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	2.42%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.29%	5.64%	+2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.67%	6.55%	+4.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.06%	11.18%	+2.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.86%	12.59%	+4.27%

HBF.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBF.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPH.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBF.TO vs. ZPH.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, less than ZPH.TO's 10.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HBF.TO Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)	7.74%	7.27%	7.48%	7.52%	7.75%	5.64%	6.36%	6.60%	7.75%	6.88%	7.57%	7.77%
ZPH.TO BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF	10.32%	10.06%	9.95%	8.18%	8.83%	7.27%	7.67%	7.26%	6.98%	5.94%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBF.TO and ZPH.TO in my portfolio?

HBF.TO and ZPH.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HBF.TO or ZPH.TO?

On fees, ZPH.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBF.TO or ZPH.TO?

ZPH.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HBF.TO.

What is the main difference between HBF.TO and ZPH.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Harvest Portfolios Group and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HBF.TO and 0.65% for ZPH.TO.