PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBF.TO vs. VEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBF.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO) and Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBF.TO achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly lower than VEQT.TO's 12.75% return.


HBF.TO

1D
-1.15%
1M
3.49%
YTD
8.15%
6M
7.25%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
11.18%

VEQT.TO

1D
-0.54%
1M
6.10%
YTD
12.75%
6M
12.66%
1Y
31.65%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
14.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBF.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HBF.TO
Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)
8.15%15.51%13.12%11.23%-14.97%21.88%11.41%18.56%
VEQT.TO
Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio
12.75%20.37%24.73%16.70%-10.76%19.62%11.42%12.94%

Correlation

The correlation between HBF.TO and VEQT.TO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019

0.81

The correlation between HBF.TO and VEQT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

HBF.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HBF.TO
VEQT.TO

Technology

29.5%
20.3%

Financial Services

19.7%
20.7%

Consumer Defensive

15.1%
4.5%

Communication Services

10.4%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
7.8%

Industrials

5.4%
11.6%

Energy

5.1%
8.7%

Healthcare

5.0%
6.6%

Basic Materials

-

8.6%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Technology

HBF.TO
29.5%
VEQT.TO
20.3%

Financial Services

HBF.TO
19.7%
VEQT.TO
20.7%

Consumer Defensive

HBF.TO
15.1%
VEQT.TO
4.5%

Communication Services

HBF.TO
10.4%
VEQT.TO
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HBF.TO
9.9%
VEQT.TO
7.8%

Industrials

HBF.TO
5.4%
VEQT.TO
11.6%

Energy

HBF.TO
5.1%
VEQT.TO
8.7%

Healthcare

HBF.TO
5.0%
VEQT.TO
6.6%

Basic Materials

HBF.TO

-

VEQT.TO
8.6%

Real Estate

HBF.TO

-

VEQT.TO
2.2%

Utilities

HBF.TO

-

VEQT.TO
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBF.TO vs. VEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBF.TO
HBF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HBF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HBF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VEQT.TO
VEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBF.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO) and Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBF.TOVEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.51

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

3.95

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

17.38

-4.03

HBF.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the VEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBF.TO and VEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBF.TOVEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.74

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.09

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.91

-0.41

Drawdowns

HBF.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBF.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.28%, which is greater than VEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBF.TO and VEQT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBF.TOVEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.28%

-30.45%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.79%

-8.05%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.21%

-15.46%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.69%

-18.32%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-0.54%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-3.71%

-3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.83%

+0.06%

Volatility

HBF.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO) is 2.65%, while Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT.TO) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that HBF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBF.TOVEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

3.68%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.79%

9.37%

-1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.29%

11.61%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.07%

12.90%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

15.77%

+1.18%

HBF.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBF.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VEQT.TO's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBF.TO vs. VEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than VEQT.TO's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HBF.TO
Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)
7.41%7.27%7.48%7.52%7.75%5.62%6.34%6.57%7.72%6.86%7.54%7.74%
VEQT.TO
Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio
1.26%1.42%1.58%1.88%2.09%1.40%1.48%1.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBF.TO and VEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HBF.TO.

HBF.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while VEQT.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harvest Portfolios Group and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HBF.TO and 0.24% for VEQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBF.TO and VEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer