HBB.TO vs. HBNK.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HBB.TO (Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF) and HBNK.TO (Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBB.TO is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Select Universe Bond, while HBNK.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HBB.TO returned 2.70% vs 60.09% for HBNK.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.

Performance

HBB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBB.TO achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than HBNK.TO's 18.85% return.

HBB.TO

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 0.58%
• 1Y: 2.70%
• 3Y*: 3.63%
• 5Y*: 0.33%
• 10Y*: 1.30%

HBNK.TO

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 5.21%
• YTD: 18.85%
• 6M: 24.41%
• 1Y: 60.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HBB.TO Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF	1.48%	1.84%	3.96%	5.45%
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	18.85%	43.71%	24.77%	8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between HBB.TO and HBNK.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2023	0.24

Return for Risk

HBB.TO vs. HBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBB.TO

HBB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 19
HBB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
HBB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HBB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 18
HBB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
HBB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 19

HBNK.TO

HBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
HBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
HBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
HBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HBB.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	4.77	-4.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.84	6.50	-5.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.88	-0.77
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	7.13	-6.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.20	30.99	-28.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HBB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the HBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBB.TO and HBNK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBB.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	4.77	-4.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	2.66	-2.37

Drawdowns

HBB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBB.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.23%, which is greater than HBNK.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBB.TO and HBNK.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBB.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.23%	-14.78%	-3.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.78%	-8.48%	+5.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.97%	-2.30%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-2.33%	-2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.23%	1.95%	-0.72%

Volatility

HBB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) is 1.58%, while Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (HBNK.TO) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that HBB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBB.TO	HBNK.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.58%	5.00%	-3.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.43%	11.26%	-7.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.44%	12.67%	-8.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.54%	12.70%	-6.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.09%	12.70%	-5.61%

HBB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HBB.TO and HBNK.TO have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HBB.TO vs. HBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBB.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HBB.TO Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HBNK.TO Global X Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	2.82%	3.24%	4.15%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBB.TO and HBNK.TO in my portfolio?

HBB.TO and HBNK.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HBB.TO or HBNK.TO?

Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBB.TO or HBNK.TO?

HBB.TO and HBNK.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

What is the main difference between HBB.TO and HBNK.TO?

HBB.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while HBNK.TO is Financials Equities. HBB.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Select Universe Bond, while HBNK.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index.