HBAR-USD vs. META
HBAR-USD (HederaHashgraph) is a cryptocurrency, while META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, HBAR-USD returned -16.92%/yr vs 11.52%/yr for META. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HBAR-USD vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBAR-USD achieves a -26.14% return, which is significantly lower than META's -14.03% return.
HBAR-USD
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -17.44%
- YTD
- -26.14%
- 6M
- -36.26%
- 1Y
- -50.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- -16.92%
- 10Y*
- —
META
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -14.03%
- 6M
- -11.84%
- 1Y
- -16.71%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
HBAR-USD vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBAR-USD HederaHashgraph | -26.14% | -60.44% | 212.23% | 135.51% | -87.44% | 812.76% | 211.49% | -97.54% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -14.03% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 10.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBAR-USD and META is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2019 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBAR-USD vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
HBAR-USD
META
HBAR-USD vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBAR-USD | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.54 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | -1.12 | +0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBAR-USD vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBAR-USD drawdown since its inception was -97.58%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBAR-USD and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBAR-USD | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.58% | -76.74% | -20.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.39% | -33.30% | -40.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.29% | -34.15% | -45.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.79% | -76.74% | -16.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.50% | -28.06% | -56.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.51% | -15.83% | -58.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.80% | 16.06% | +35.74% |
Volatility
HBAR-USD vs. META - Volatility Comparison
HederaHashgraph (HBAR-USD) has a higher volatility of 16.33% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 10.17%. This indicates that HBAR-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBAR-USD | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.33% | 10.17% | +6.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.30% | 26.91% | +16.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.06% | 35.52% | +29.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.17% | 44.04% | +41.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.57% | 38.67% | +69.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBAR-USD and META have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HBAR-USD has higher volatility (16.33%) compared to META (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBAR-USD dropped -97.58% vs META's -76.74%.
META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HBAR-USD and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer