PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAUZ vs. SRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAUZ vs. SRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAUZ achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly higher than SRS's -14.05% return. Over the past 10 years, HAUZ has outperformed SRS with an annualized return of 3.62%, while SRS has yielded a comparatively lower -16.52% annualized return.


HAUZ

1D
-1.44%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-2.64%
6M
-1.65%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
-1.54%
10Y*
3.62%

SRS

1D
-0.27%
1M
2.82%
YTD
-14.05%
6M
-12.14%
1Y
-9.76%
3Y*
-12.75%
5Y*
-5.84%
10Y*
-16.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAUZ vs. SRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
-2.64%22.70%-5.44%6.29%-22.24%9.82%-6.23%20.89%-9.12%27.52%
SRS
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate
-14.05%-1.45%-3.55%-18.78%54.68%-52.22%-33.05%-38.97%6.01%-18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HAUZ and SRS is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2013

-0.49

The correlation between HAUZ and SRS shifts across timeframes, from -0.64 (5 years) to -0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HAUZ vs. SRS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HAUZ
SRS

Real Estate

96.5%

-

Industrials

1.3%

-

Communication Services

1.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%

-

Financial Services

0.3%
71.8%

Utilities

0.1%

-

Technology

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Real Estate

HAUZ
96.5%
SRS

-

Industrials

HAUZ
1.3%
SRS

-

Communication Services

HAUZ
1.2%
SRS

-

Consumer Cyclical

HAUZ
0.3%
SRS

-

Financial Services

HAUZ
0.3%
SRS
71.8%

Utilities

HAUZ
0.1%
SRS

-

Technology

HAUZ
0.1%
SRS

-

Basic Materials

HAUZ
0.1%
SRS

-

Healthcare

HAUZ
0.0%
SRS

-

Energy

HAUZ
0.0%
SRS

-

Consumer Defensive

HAUZ
0.0%
SRS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAUZ vs. SRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAUZ
HAUZ Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HAUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
HAUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SRS
SRS Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAUZ vs. SRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HAUZSRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.96

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

-0.48

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.28

-1.08

+2.36

HAUZ vs. SRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAUZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the SRS Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAUZ and SRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HAUZSRSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

-0.36

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

-0.16

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

-0.41

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

-0.50

+0.67

Drawdowns

HAUZ vs. SRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAUZ drawdown since its inception was -39.51%, smaller than the maximum SRS drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAUZ and SRS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAUZSRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.51%

-99.96%

+60.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-20.53%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.88%

-51.56%

+33.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

-51.56%

+17.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.51%

-85.82%

+46.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.73%

-99.96%

+88.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-91.23%

+79.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

9.08%

-4.43%

Volatility

HAUZ vs. SRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) is 4.73%, while ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that HAUZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAUZSRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

7.58%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.47%

19.34%

-7.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.83%

27.06%

-13.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

37.58%

-21.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

40.67%

-23.70%

HAUZ vs. SRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAUZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SRS's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAUZ vs. SRS - Dividend Comparison

HAUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than SRS's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
4.58%4.46%4.50%3.50%1.99%4.84%3.37%3.69%1.93%2.59%2.18%9.42%
SRS
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate
3.67%3.61%6.06%4.49%0.30%0.00%0.19%1.80%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAUZ and SRS have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRS has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to HAUZ (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAUZ dropped -39.51% vs SRS's -99.96%.

On 10-year performance, HAUZ leads with 3.62% vs -16.52% for SRS. On fees, HAUZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, HAUZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HAUZ has performed better with a 3.62% return vs -16.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAUZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRS.

HAUZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 3.67% for SRS.

HAUZ tracks iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index, while SRS tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: DWS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HAUZ and 0.95% for SRS.

HAUZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAUZ and SRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer