HAUZ vs. IBIC
HAUZ (Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAUZ is a REIT fund tracking the iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HAUZ returned 3.47% vs 4.38% for IBIC. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
HAUZ vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAUZ achieves a -3.40% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.39% return.
HAUZ
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- YTD
- -3.40%
- 6M
- -2.77%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.14%
- 5Y*
- -1.52%
- 10Y*
- 3.66%
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAUZ vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HAUZ Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | -3.40% | 22.70% | -5.44% | 8.96% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.39% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAUZ and IBIC is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.09 |
The correlation between HAUZ and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAUZ vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
HAUZ
IBIC
HAUZ vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAUZ | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 2.21 | -1.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 16.41 | -16.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | 58.11 | -57.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAUZ vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAUZ drawdown since its inception was -39.51%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAUZ and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAUZ | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.51% | -0.90% | -38.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -0.27% | -13.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.42% | -0.11% | -12.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -0.10% | -11.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 0.08% | +5.20% |
Volatility
HAUZ vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that HAUZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAUZ | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 0.16% | +3.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 0.67% | +11.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.06% | 0.89% | +13.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 1.57% | +14.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 1.57% | +15.38% |
HAUZ vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HAUZ and IBIC have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HAUZ vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
HAUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAUZ Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | 3.68% | 4.46% | 4.50% | 3.50% | 1.99% | 4.84% | 3.37% | 3.69% | 1.93% | 2.59% | 2.18% | 9.42% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAUZ and IBIC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAUZ has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAUZ dropped -39.51% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.38% vs 3.47% for HAUZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.38% return vs 3.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAUZ and IBIC have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
HAUZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.
HAUZ is categorized as REIT, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. HAUZ tracks iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAUZ and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer